...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Human Genetics >Probability that a two-stage genome-wide association study will detect a disease-associated snp and implications for multistage designs.
【24h】

Probability that a two-stage genome-wide association study will detect a disease-associated snp and implications for multistage designs.

机译:两阶段全基因组关联研究将检测与疾病相关的snp的可能性以及对多阶段设计的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Large two-stage genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been shown to reduce required genotyping with little loss of power, compared to a one-stage design, provided a substantial fraction of cases and controls, pi(sample), is included in stage 1. However, a number of recent GWASs have used pi(sample) < 0.2. Moreover, standard power calculations are not applicable because SNPs are selected in stage 1 by ranking their p-values, rather than comparing each SNP's statistic to a fixed critical value. We define the detection probability (DP) of a two-stage design as the probability that a given disease-associated SNP will have a p-value among the lowest ranks of p-values at stage 1, and, among those SNPs selected at stage 1, at stage 2. For 8000 cases and 8000 controls available for study and for odds ratios per allele in the range 1.1-1.3, we show that DP is substantially reduced for designs with pi(sample)
机译:与一阶段设计相比,大型两阶段全基因组关联研究(GWAS)可以减少所需的基因分型,并且几乎没有能量损失,前提是病例和对照中包含了很大一部分pi(样本)第一阶段。但是,最近的许多GWAS使用的pi(sample)<0.2。而且,标准功率计算不适用,因为在阶段1中通过对SNP的p值进行排序而不是将每个SNP的统计量与固定的临界值进行比较来选择SNP。我们将两阶段设计的检测概率(DP)定义为:与疾病相关的SNP在阶段1的最低p值等级中,以及在阶段选择的那些SNP中具有p值的概率1,在第2阶段。对于可供研究的8000个病例和8000个对照以及每个等位基因的比值比在1.1-1.3范围内,我们表明pi(sample)<或= 0.25的设计的DP显着降低,并且DP联合分析阶段1和阶段2的数据不能明显增加。这些结果表明应避免使用较小的第一阶段(例如pi(sample)<或= 0.25)的多阶段设计,并且在较小的第一阶段的早期研究中进行额外的基因分型将产生先前未选择的疾病相关SNP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号