...
首页> 外文期刊>Microbiology Education Journal >Interventions for Supporting and Assessing Science Writing Communication: Cases of Asian English Language Learners
【24h】

Interventions for Supporting and Assessing Science Writing Communication: Cases of Asian English Language Learners

机译:支持和评估科学写作交流的干预措施:以亚洲英语学习者为例

获取原文
           

摘要

In seeking to support diversity, one challenge lies in adequately supporting and assessing science cognitions in a writing-intensive Biochemistry laboratory course when highly engaged Asian English language learners (Asian ELLs) struggle to communicate and make novice errors in English. Because they may understand advanced science concepts, but are not being adequately assessed for their deeper scientific understanding, we sought and examined interventions. We hypothesized that inquiry strategies, scaffolded learning through peer evaluation, and individualized tools that build writing communication skills would increase confidence. To assess scientific thinking, Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) software measured underlying analytic and cognitive features of writing despite grammatical errors. To determine whether interventions improved student experience or learning outcomes, we investigated a cross-sectional sample of cases within experimental groups (n = 19) using a mixed-methods approach. Overall trends of paired t-tests from Asian ELLs’ pre/post surveys showed gains in six measures of writing confidence, with some statistically significant gains in confidence in writing skill (p=0.025) and in theory (p≤0.05). LIWC scores for Asian ELL and native-English-speaking students were comparable except for increased cognitive scores for Asian ELLs and detectable individual differences. An increase in Asian ELLs’ cognitive scores in spring/summer over fall was observed (p = 0.04), likely as a result of greater cognitive processes with language use, inquiry-related interventions, and peer evaluation. Individual cases further elucidated challenges faced by Asian ELL students. LIWC scores of student writing may be useful in determining underlying understanding. Interventions designed to provide support and strengthen the writing of Asian ELL students may also improve their confidence in writing, even if improvement is gradual.
机译:在寻求支持多样性的过程中,一个挑战在于,当高度参与的亚洲英语学习者(Asian ELLs)努力交流英语并犯下新手错误时,就需要在写作密集的生物化学实验室课程中充分支持和评估科学认知。由于他们可能了解先进的科学概念,但对他们的更深层次的科学认识并未得到充分评估,因此我们寻求并研究了干预措施。我们假设,探究策略,通过同伴评估进行的脚手架学习以及建立写作交流技能的个性化工具将增加自信心。为了评估科学思维,尽管存在语法错误,语言查询字数统计(LIWC)软件仍然测量了写作的基本分析和认知特征。为了确定干预措施是否能改善学生的学习体验或学习成果,我们使用混合方法调查了实验组(n = 19)病例的横断面样本。亚洲ELL之前/之后调查的配对t检验的总体趋势显示,六种写作信心指标有所提高,在写作技巧(p = 0.025)和理论上(p≤0.05)方面有统计学上的显着提高。亚洲ELL和以英语为母语的学生的LIWC得分可比,除了亚洲ELL的认知得分增加和可检测的个体差异外。观察到在春季/夏季秋季,亚洲ELL的认知得分有所提高(p = 0.04),这可能是由于语言使用,与查询相关的干预措施以及同伴评估导致的认知过程增加所致。个别案例进一步阐明了亚洲ELL学生面临的挑战。 LIWC学生写作分数可能有助于确定基本理解。旨在提供支持和加强亚洲ELL学生写作的干预措施,即使是逐步的,也可能会提高他们对写作的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号