首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Microbiology Biology Education >Interventions for Supporting and Assessing Science Writing Communication: Cases of Asian English Language Learners
【2h】

Interventions for Supporting and Assessing Science Writing Communication: Cases of Asian English Language Learners

机译:支持和评估科学写作交流的干预措施:以亚洲英语学习者为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In seeking to support diversity, one challenge lies in adequately supporting and assessing science cognitions in a writing-intensive Biochemistry laboratory course when highly engaged Asian English language learners (Asian ELLs) struggle to communicate and make novice errors in English. Because they may understand advanced science concepts, but are not being adequately assessed for their deeper scientific understanding, we sought and examined interventions. We hypothesized that inquiry strategies, scaffolded learning through peer evaluation, and individualized tools that build writing communication skills would increase confidence. To assess scientific thinking, Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) software measured underlying analytic and cognitive features of writing despite grammatical errors. To determine whether interventions improved student experience or learning outcomes, we investigated a cross-sectional sample of cases within experimental groups (n = 19) using a mixed-methods approach. Overall trends of paired t-tests from Asian ELLs’ pre/post surveys showed gains in six measures of writing confidence, with some statistically significant gains in confidence in writing skill (p=0.025) and in theory (p≤0.05). LIWC scores for Asian ELL and native-English-speaking students were comparable except for increased cognitive scores for Asian ELLs and detectable individual differences. An increase in Asian ELLs’ cognitive scores in spring/summer over fall was observed (p = 0.04), likely as a result of greater cognitive processes with language use, inquiry-related interventions, and peer evaluation. Individual cases further elucidated challenges faced by Asian ELL students. LIWC scores of student writing may be useful in determining underlying understanding. Interventions designed to provide support and strengthen the writing of Asian ELL students may also improve their confidence in writing, even if improvement is gradual.
机译:在寻求支持多样性的过程中,一个挑战在于,当高度参与的亚洲英语学习者(Asian ELLs)努力交流英语并犯下新手错误时,就需要在写作密集的生物化学实验室课程中充分支持和评估科学认知。由于他们可能了解先进的科学概念,但对他们的更深层次的科学认识并未得到充分评估,因此我们寻求并研究了干预措施。我们假设,探究策略,通过同伴评估进行的脚手架学习以及建立写作交流技能的个性化工具会增加自信心。为了评估科学思维,尽管存在语法错误,语言查询单词计数(LIWC)软件仍对写作的基本分析和认知特征进行了测量。为了确定干预措施是否能改善学生的学习体验或学习成果,我们使用混合方法调查了实验组(n = 19)病例的横断面样本。来自亚洲ELL之前/之后调查的配对t检验的总体趋势显示,六种写作信心测量指标均有所提高,在写作技巧(p = 0.025)和理论上(p≤0.05)方面有统计学上的显着提高。亚洲ELL和以英语为母语的学生的LIWC得分可比,除了亚洲ELL的认知得分增加和可检测的个体差异外。观察到在春季/夏季,亚洲ELL的认知得分比秋季提高了(p = 0.04),这可能是由于语言使用,与查询相关的干预措施以及同伴评估的认知过程增多所致。个别案例进一步阐明了亚洲ELL学生面临的挑战。 LIWC学生写作分数可能有助于确定基本理解。旨在提供支持和加强亚洲ELL学生写作能力的干预措施,即使是逐步的,也可能会提高他们对写作的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号