首页> 外文会议>International symposium on computer-assisted language learning >Amplifier Collocations in the Chinese Learner English Corpus
【24h】

Amplifier Collocations in the Chinese Learner English Corpus

机译:中国学习者英语语料库中的放大器搭配

获取原文

摘要

This paper is an analysis of the usage of amplifiers in the Chinese Learner English Corpus (CLEC). As a specific type of adverbs of degree, amplifiers, such as absolutely, really, and very, are considered to "express degrees of increasing intensification upwards from an assumed norm". Kennedy (2003) further divides amplifiers into maximizers and boosters. This paper adopts his definition and categorization and uses the mutual information measure (MI) to examine the collocational usage of 23 amplifiers, including 7 maximizers and 16 boosters in CLEC. In comparison with Kennedy's (2003) study of 24 amplifiers in the British National Corpus (BNC), this paper studies Chinese Learners' usage of amplifiers from three aspects: the most frequent pattern usages, the overuse, underuse and misuse of certain patterns, and the possible causes. The major findings can be summarized as follows. Firsdy, while Kennedy finds that most amplifier collocates are adjectives or participles in BNC, most amplifier collocates are verbs in CLEC.Secondly, while most amplifiers show clear preference to negative or positive collocates in Kennedy's study, this paper has found similar preferences of some amplifiers and yet remarkably different preferences of others. In addition, the use of the 23 selected amplifiers is not only more limited but also more interchangeable in CLEC. This shows that learners not only lack the mastery of their usage but also lack the appropriate awareness of their preference in pattern usage. The conclusions we arrive at suggest that amplifiers are probably stored as single words in their memory so that learners are not able to use them appropriately in certain patterns.
机译:本文是对中国学习者英语语料库(CLEC)放大器的使用分析。作为学位的特定类型的副词,放大器,例如绝对,真正,非常,非常被认为是“从假定的规范向上表达增加的增强程度”。肯尼迪(2003)进一步将放大器分为最大化器和助推器。本文采用了他的定义和分类,并使用了相互信息测量(MI)来检查23个放大器的搭配使用,包括在CLEC中的7个最大化器和16个助推器。与肯尼迪(2003年)在英国国家语料库(BNC)的24个放大器的研究相比,本文研究了中国学习者从三个方面的放大器使用:最常见的模式使用,过度使用,欠缺和滥用某些模式,以及某些模式的滥用可能的原因。主要发现可以如下综述。 Firsdy,而肯尼迪发现大多数放大器搭配是BNC中的形容词或分词,大多数放大器搭配在Clec.secondly中是动词,而大多数放大器则显示肯尼迪的研究中的负面或积极的搭配清晰的偏好,发现了一些放大器的偏好然而,其他人的偏好也非常不同。此外,使用23所选放大器的使用不仅更有限,而且在CLEC中也更互换。这表明学习者不仅缺乏对他们的使用掌握,而且缺乏对模式使用中偏好的适当意识。我们到达的结论表明放大器可能在其内存中作为单个单词存储,以便学习者无法在某些模式中适当地使用它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号