首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management >Study on Heightening Validity of High-tech Service Enterprises' Performance Evaluation (ID: 8-035)
【24h】

Study on Heightening Validity of High-tech Service Enterprises' Performance Evaluation (ID: 8-035)

机译:高技术服务企业绩效评估有效性提升研究(ID:8-035)

获取原文

摘要

The single performance evaluation based on task has low reliability and availability. This text tests the evaluation results from "diathesis- ability- achievement" performance evaluation mode of G subsidiary company of China Mobile. The distributing sections of direct superior evaluation marks and Colleague-evaluation marks are obviously different. The differences come out in the seven evaluation latitudes too. These can be explained well by double-factor performance mode. The difference is caused by not differentiating "task performance" and "relation performance". The High-tech service enterprises tie to the technique high and represent innovation and agility. According to the idiosyncrasies of the High-tech service enterprises, the single performance evaluation should be divided into "task performance evaluation" for technique department and "relation performance evaluation" for function department. In this way the evaluation will be more effectual. In addition scientific test, effectual evaluation index, basic rules for evaluation of the enterprises and valuators are also very important for promoting the availability of performance evaluation.
机译:基于任务的单个性能评估具有较低的可靠性和可用性。本文测试了中国移动G子公司“素质-成就-成就”绩效评估模式的评估结果。直接上级评估标志和同事评估标志的分布区域明显不同。差异也来自七个评估纬度。这些可以通过双因素性能模式很好地解释。差异是由于不区分“任务性能”和“关系性能”而引起的。高科技服务企业将技术紧紧结合在一起,代表着创新和敏捷。根据高科技服务企业的特质,应将单一绩效评估分为技术部门的“任务绩效评估”和职能部门的“关系绩效评估”。这样,评估将更加有效。除了科学的测试,有效的评估指标,企业和评估者评估的基本规则,对于提高绩效评估的可用性也非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号