首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management >Study on Heightening Validity of High-tech Service Enterprises' Performance Evaluation (ID: 8-035)
【24h】

Study on Heightening Validity of High-tech Service Enterprises' Performance Evaluation (ID: 8-035)

机译:高科技服务企业绩效评估的高度有效性研究(ID:8-035)

获取原文

摘要

The single performance evaluation based on task has low reliability and availability. This text tests the evaluation results from "diathesis- ability- achievement" performance evaluation mode of G subsidiary company of China Mobile. The distributing sections of direct superior evaluation marks and Colleague-evaluation marks are obviously different. The differences come out in the seven evaluation latitudes too. These can be explained well by double-factor performance mode. The difference is caused by not differentiating "task performance" and "relation performance". The High-tech service enterprises tie to the technique high and represent innovation and agility. According to the idiosyncrasies of the High-tech service enterprises, the single performance evaluation should be divided into "task performance evaluation" for technique department and "relation performance evaluation" for function department. In this way the evaluation will be more effectual. In addition scientific test, effectual evaluation index, basic rules for evaluation of the enterprises and valuators are also very important for promoting the availability of performance evaluation.
机译:基于任务的单个性能评估具有低可靠性和可用性。本文测试了中国移动G子公司的“介质能力 - 成就”绩效评估模式的评价结果​​。直接卓越评价标志和同事评价标志的分布部分显然是不同的。七个评估纬度也出现了差异。这些可以通过双因素性能模式来解释它们。差异是由不区分“任务性能”和“关系性能”引起的。高科技服务企业推向技术高,代表着创新和敏捷性。根据高科技服务企业的特质,单一绩效评估应分为“任务绩效评估”,为技术部门和“关系绩效评估”为功能部门。以这种方式,评估将更有效。此外,科学检验,有效的评价指标,评估企业和估值的基本规则对于促进绩效评估的可用性也非常重要。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号