...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Spinal deformity correction in Marfan syndrome versus adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Learning from the differences
【24h】

Spinal deformity correction in Marfan syndrome versus adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Learning from the differences

机译:马凡综合征与青少年特发性脊柱侧凸矫正脊柱畸形:从差异中学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective case control study. OBJECTIVE.: To compare patients with Marfan syndrome and matched patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to illustrate the differences and identify areas for potential surgical improvement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Patients with Marfan syndrome commonly require spinal deformity surgery, but practice guidelines and results are not as established as those for patients with AIS. METHODS.: We matched 34 adolescents with Marfan syndrome with patients with AIS (ratio, 1:2) for age, sex, and degree of major deformity. Overall mean age was 14 ± 2 years and mean curves were 51° thoracic and 46° lumbar. Mean follow-up was 5.3 and 3.6 years, respectively. RESULTS.: The Marfan syndrome group had significantly more thoracolumbar kyphosis correction (9.5° vs. 0.1°, P = 0.05), significantly more levels fused (12 ± 2 vs. 9 ± 3, P ≤ 0.01), significantly more fusions to the pelvis (7 vs. 0, P = 0.01), and significantly more correction of sagittal imbalance (2.4 vs. -0.6 cm, P = 0.035). The Marfan syndrome group also had more intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (3 vs. 0, P = 0.01), significantly more instrumentation complications (3 vs. 1, P = 0.007), more reoperations for indications [such as fixation failure, distal degeneration, and spine fracture (9 vs. 0, P = 0.01)], and lower SRS-22 total (3.9 vs. 4.5, P = 0.01) and partial (P < 0.015) subscores. There were no significant differences between the groups in progression of unfused proximal thoracic curves, blood loss, neurological deficit, hospital stay, percent correction, or infection rate. CONCLUSION.: Patients with Marfan syndrome differ in several ways from those with AIS: they require more levels of surgical correction, more distal fusion, greater correction of sagittal balance, and more reoperations, and they have more intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks and instrumentation-related complications. Knowledge of these differences is important for planning surgery.
机译:研究设计:回顾性病例对照研究。目的:比较马凡氏综合征患者和青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者,以说明差异并确定潜在的手术改善区域。背景资料摘要:马凡氏综合征患者通常需要进行脊柱畸形手术,但实践指南和结果并不像AIS患者那样确定。方法:我们将34名马凡氏综合症青少年与AIS(比率为1:2)的患者的年龄,性别和严重畸形程度进行匹配。总体平均年龄为14±2岁,平均曲线为胸椎51°和腰椎46°。平均随访时间分别为5。3年和3。6年。结果:马凡综合症组的胸腰椎后凸畸形矫正率明显更高(9.5°vs. 0.1°,P = 0.05),融合水平显着更高(12±2 vs. 9±3,P≤0.01),与胸廓的融合明显更多。骨盆(7 vs. 0,P = 0.01),以及更多的矢状不平衡矫正(2.4 vs.-0.6 cm,P = 0.035)。 Marfan综合征组的术中脑脊液漏量也更多(3比0,P = 0.01),器械并发症多得多(3 vs. 1,P = 0.007),更多的手术指征(如固定失败,远端变性,和脊柱骨折(9 vs. 0,P = 0.01)],较低的SRS-22总评分(3.9 vs. 4.5,P = 0.01)和部分评分(P <0.015)。两组之间在未融合的近端胸廓弯曲,失血,神经功能缺损,住院时间,矫正百分比或感染率方面无显着差异。结论:马凡氏综合症患者与AIS患者在几个方面有所不同:他们需要更高水平的手术矫正,更多的远端融合术,更好的矢状平衡矫正和更多的再手术,并且他们的术中脑脊液渗漏和与器械相关的更多并发症。了解这些差异对于计划手术很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号