首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education today >How to maintain equity and objectivity in assessing the communication skills in a large group of student nurses during a long examination session, using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)
【24h】

How to maintain equity and objectivity in assessing the communication skills in a large group of student nurses during a long examination session, using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

机译:如何使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)在长时间的考试中评估大批学生护士的沟通技巧时保持公平和客观

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: While development, testing, and innovation of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) are common in the international literature, studies from the United States of America (USA), Australia, and the United Kingdom (UK) predominate. There is little known about OSCE use in European countries, such as Italy, where other than cost analysis, there is little reporting of OSCE use or validation.
机译:背景:尽管客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的开发,测试和创新在国际文献中很普遍,但来自美国(USA),澳大利亚和英国(UK)的研究占主导地位。在欧洲国家,例如意大利,对OSCE的使用知之甚少,在意大利,除成本分析外,几乎没有关于OSCE使用或验证的报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号