首页> 外文期刊>Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution >Interpreting rejections of the beneficial acclimation hypothesis: When is physiological plasticity adaptive?
【24h】

Interpreting rejections of the beneficial acclimation hypothesis: When is physiological plasticity adaptive?

机译:解释对有益适应假设的拒绝:生理可塑性何时适应?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although many studies testing the beneficial acclimation hypothesis have rejected it, what these rejections imply about the adaptive value of physiological change remains unclear. Uncertainty arises because the hypothesis focuses on the relative performance of organisms exposed to one environment versus another, whereas the raw material available to evolution is variation in acclimation responses of individual traits. This mismatch is problematic when organisms are exposed to poor environments. In poor environments, the adaptive or maladaptive value of changes in individual traits may be obscured by long-term decrements in organismal condition. A better match between the evolutionary pressures shaping acclimation and the tests used to examine them can be achieved by focusing on the fitness consequences of acclimation changes in individual traits. [References: 41]
机译:尽管许多测试有益的适应性假设的研究都拒绝了它,但是这些否定暗示着生理变化的适应性价值仍然不清楚。之所以会出现不确定性,是因为该假设着重于暴露于一种环境的生物相对于另一种环境的相对性能,而可用于进化的原材料是各个性状的适应反应的变化。当有机体暴露在恶劣的环境中时,这种失配是有问题的。在恶劣的环境中,个体性状变化的适应性或适应不良性价值可能会因机体状况的长期下降而被掩盖。通过关注个体性状中适应性变化的适应性后果,可以实现进化压力塑造适应性和用于检验它们的测试之间的更好匹配。 [参考:41]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号