...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Influence of scaffold stiffness on subchondral bone and subsequent cartilage regeneration in an ovine model of osteochondral defect healing.
【24h】

Influence of scaffold stiffness on subchondral bone and subsequent cartilage regeneration in an ovine model of osteochondral defect healing.

机译:在骨软骨缺损愈合的绵羊模型中,支架刚度对软骨下骨及其后软骨再生的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In osteochondral defects, subchondral bone, as a load-bearing structure, is believed to be important for bone and cartilage regeneration. HYPOTHESIS: A stiff scaffold creates better conditions for bone formation and cartilage regeneration than does a softer one. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Critical osteochondral defects were created in the femoral condyles of 24 sheep. Subchondral bone was reconstructed with a stiff scaffold or a modified softer one, with untreated defects serving as controls. The repair response was evaluated with mechanical, histological, and histomorphometrical techniques at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The elastic modulus of regenerated fibrocartilage over the stiff scaffold tended to be higher than in the soft scaffold group (61% vs 46% of healthy cartilage) at 3 months. No difference was determined at 6 months; all were well below healthy cartilage. Treated defects showed substantial degradation of the soft scaffold with surrounding sclerotic bone at 3 and 6 months. In contrast, degradation of the stiff scaffold was slower and occurred together with continuous osseous replacement. CONCLUSION: Stiff scaffolds were found to improve bone regeneration. In contrast, soft scaffolds provided less support, and consequently subchondral bone became sclerotic. Although regenerated cartilage formed over the stiff scaffolds at 3 months, and these exhibited better mechanical properties than did the soft scaffold group, the mechanical properties in both treated groups were the same at 6 months, not dissimilar to that of tissue formed in the untreated specimens and inferior to native articular cartilage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results imply that subchondral defect filling in clinical settings advances bone regeneration and should have a comparable stiffness to that of healthy subchondral bone rather than being too flexible. Degradation of resorbable materials and consequently the loss of stiffness may compromise the healing of critical defects.
机译:背景:在骨软骨缺损中,软骨下骨作为一种承重结构,被认为对骨骼和软骨的再生很重要。假设:与较软的支架相比,刚性的支架为骨形成和软骨再生创造了更好的条件。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:在24只绵羊的股骨dy中形成了严重的骨软骨缺损。用坚硬的支架或改良的较软的支架重建软骨下骨,并以未处理的缺损作为对照。术后3个月和6个月用机械,组织学和组织形态计量学技术评估修复反应。结果:在3个月时,硬质支架上的再生纤维软骨的弹性模量往往高于软质支架组(61%vs 46%的健康软骨)。 6个月时无差异;所有这些都远低于健康软骨。经过治疗的缺损在3个月和6个月时,软支架和周围的硬化骨显着降解。相反,刚性支架的降解较慢,并且与连续骨置换一起发生。结论:僵硬的脚手架可以改善骨骼的再生。相反,软支架提供的支撑较少,因此软骨下骨硬化。尽管在3个月时在刚性支架上形成了再生软骨,并且这些软骨表现出比软支架组更好的机械性能,但是两个治疗组在6个月时的机械性能相同,与未处理样品中形成的组织没有什么不同并且不如天然关节软骨。临床相关性:结果表明,临床环境中软骨下缺损的充盈促进了骨的再生,并且应具有与健康的软骨下骨相当的刚度,而不是太柔韧。可吸收材料的降解以及因此导致的刚度损失可能会损害关键缺陷的愈合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号