...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of International Law >European Convention on Human Rights - exhaustion of domestic remedies - effectiveness of domestic remedies
【24h】

European Convention on Human Rights - exhaustion of domestic remedies - effectiveness of domestic remedies

机译:《欧洲人权公约》-用尽国内补救办法-国内补救办法的效力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The applicants in Demopoulos v. Turkey, all Cypriot nationals of Greek Cypriot origin, claimed to own immovable property in the northern part of Cyprus. They complained mainly under Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights (Convention) that they had been deprived of their property in northern Cyprus, which is under the control of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). None of the applicants had made an application to the Immovable Property Commission (IPC) for restitution or, compensation in respect of their property. The IPC, established pursuant to Law 67/2005 enacted by the TRNC Parliament, can examine and reach decisions on applications brought by all natural and legal persons claiming rights to immovable or movable property in northern Cyprus. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held that (1) the IPC procedure may be regarded as part of the domestic remedies of Turkey, and (2) the IPC provides accessible and effective redress to Greek Cypriots for violations of their property rights. The Court accordingly rejected the present applications for nonexhaustion of domestic remedies.
机译:所有属于希族塞人的塞族国民Demopoulos诉土耳其一案的申诉人声称在塞浦路斯北部拥有不动产。他们主要根据《欧洲人权公约(公约)第一议定书》第1条提出申诉,他们被剥夺了在北塞浦路斯土耳其共和国(TRNC)控制下的北塞浦路斯的财产。申请人均未向不动产委员会(IPC)申请归还财产或补偿其财产。根据TRNC议会颁布的第67/2005号法律建立的IPC,可以审查并要求所有自然人和法人在塞浦路斯北部主张不动产或动产权利的申请作出决定。欧洲人权法院大法庭认为,(1)IPC程序可被视为土耳其国内补救措施的一部分,(2)IPC为希族塞人侵犯其财产权提供了可及的有效补救措施。因此,法院驳回了目前关于用尽国内补救办法的申请。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号