首页> 外文期刊>Liverpool Law Review >Taking Care of Strasbourg: The Status of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights in Kosovo’s Domestic Legal System
【24h】

Taking Care of Strasbourg: The Status of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights in Kosovo’s Domestic Legal System

机译:照顾史特拉斯堡:《欧洲人权公约》的地位和欧洲人权法院在科索沃国内法律体系中的判例法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper addresses the position of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case-law in Kosovo’s domestic legal order. To begin with, it reviews the background of the issue of human rights in Kosovo highlighting its distinct position and perspective. This article then analyses the position held by the European Convention on Human Rights and its protocols in Kosovo’s legal order while also addressing the ECHR’s constitutionalization, its direct effect and the constitutional review on basis of it. The paper then examines whether the case-law of the ECtHR is binding in Kosovo, whether it is directly effective, and whether Kosovo’s Constitutional Court can use it as a ground in the conduct of constitutional reviews. This paper argues that the ECHR and the case-law of the ECtHR both hold a privileged status under Kosovo’s constitutional law, despite Kosovo not being a party to the ECHR and, therefore, having no international liability to implement the ECHR. In addition, the paper offers certain arguments regarding the relative positions of the ECHR and the case-law of the ECtHR within the current practice of Kosovo’s judicial system. This paper concludes with the argument that the ECHR and the case-law of the ECtHR hold a privileged status in the context of Kosovo’s domestic legal order—one which could serve as a precedent in respecting human rights and freedoms.
机译:本文阐述了《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR)和欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)判例法在科索沃国内法律秩序中的地位。首先,它回顾了科索沃人权问题的背景,强调了其独特的立场和观点。然后,本文分析了《欧洲人权公约》及其议定书在科索沃法律秩序中的立场,同时也论述了ECHR的宪法化,其直接影响和以此为基础的宪法审查。然后,本文研究了ECtHR的判例法在科索沃是否具有约束力,是否直接有效,以及科索沃宪法法院是否可以将其用作进行宪法审查的依据。本文认为,尽管科索沃不是《欧洲人权公约》的缔约国,但《欧洲人权公约》和《欧洲人权公约》判例法均在科索沃宪法中享有特权地位,因此,对执行《欧洲人权公约》不承担任何国际责任。此外,本文就ECHR的相对位置和ECtHR的判例法在科索沃现行司法制度中提供了某些论点。本文的结论是,在科索沃国内法律秩序的背景下,欧洲人权法院和欧洲人权法院的判例法享有特权地位,这可以作为尊重人权和自由的先例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号