...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in physiology education >Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instructionmethods and academic achievement in medical education?
【24h】

Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instructionmethods and academic achievement in medical education?

机译:学习风格可以预测学生对医学教育中不同教学方法和学习成绩的满意度吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The cur-riculum of our medical school has a hybrid structure including bothtraditional training (lectures) and problem-based learning (PBL) ap-plications. The purpose of this study was to determine the learningstyles of our medical students and investigate the relation of learningstyles with each of satisfaction with different instruction methods andacademic achievement in them. This study was carried out with theparticipation of 170 first-year medical students (the participation ratewas 91.4%). The researchers prepared sociodemographic and satis-faction questionnaires to determine the characteristics of the partici-pants and their satisfaction levels with traditional training and PBL.The Kolb learning styles inventory was used to explore the learningstyles of the study group. The participants completed all forms at theend of the first year of medical education. Indicators of academicachievement were scores of five theoretical block exams and five PBLexams performed throughout the academic year of 2008-2009. Themajority of the participants took part in the "diverging" (n = 84,47.7%) and "assimilating" (n = 73, 41.5%) groups. Numbers ofstudents in the "converging" and "accommodating" groups were 11(6.3%) and 8 (4.5%), respectively. In all learning style groups, PBLsatisfaction scores were significantly higher than those of traditionaltraining. Exam scores for "PBL and traditional training" did not differamong the four learning styles. In logistic regression analysis, learn-ing style (assimilating) predicted student satisfaction with traditionaltraining and success in theoretical block exams. Nothing predictedPBL satisfaction and success. This is the first study conducted amongmedical students evaluating the relation of learning style with studentsatisfaction and academic achievement. More research with largergroups is needed to generalize our results. Some learning styles mayrelate to satisfaction with and achievement in some instructionmethods.
机译:我们医学院的课程具有混合结构,包括传统培训(讲座)和基于问题的学习(PBL)应用。这项研究的目的是确定我们的医学生的学习风格,并研究学习风格与他们对不同教学方法和学习成绩的满意程度之间的关系。这项研究是在170名一年级医学生的参与下进行的(参与率为91.4%)。研究人员准备了社会人口统计学和满意度调查表,以确定参与者的特征以及他们在传统培训和PBL培训中的满意度.Kolb学习风格清单用于探讨研究组的学习风格。参加者在医学教育的第一年末完成了所有表格。学业成就的指标是在整个2008-2009学年进行的五次理论基础考试和五次PBLexam成绩。大部分参与者参加了“分散”组(n = 84.47.7%)和“同化”组(n = 73,41.5%)。 “融合”和“适应”组的学生人数分别为11(6.3%)和8(4.5%)。在所有学习方式组中,PBL满意度得分均显着高于传统培训。 “ PBL和传统培训”的考试成绩在四种学习方式之间没有差异。在逻辑回归分析中,学习方式(同化)可预测学生对传统培训的满意程度以及理论块考试的成功率。没有什么能预测PBL的满意度和成功。这是对医学生进行的第一项研究,旨在评估学习风格与学生满意度和学业成绩之间的关系。需要对更大的群体进行更多的研究来概括我们的结果。一些学习方式可能与某些教学方法中的满意度和成就有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号