首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >What Demographic and Clinical Factors Are Associated with In-hospital Mortality in Patients with Necrotizing Fasciitis?
【24h】

What Demographic and Clinical Factors Are Associated with In-hospital Mortality in Patients with Necrotizing Fasciitis?

机译:患有坏死性筋膜炎的患者的住院死亡率有什么人口统计和临床因素?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Necrotizing fasciitis is a rare infection with rapid deterioration and a high mortality rate. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality have not been thoroughly evaluated. Although predictive models identifying the diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis have been described (such as the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis [LRINEC]), their use in predicting mortality is limited. Questions/purposes (1) What demographic factors are associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis? (2) What clinical factors are associated with in-hospital mortality? (3) What laboratory values are associated with in-hospital mortality? (4) Is the LRINEC score useful in predicting mortality? Methods We retrospectively studied all patients with necrotizing fasciitis at our tertiary care institution during a 10-year period. In all, 134 patients were identified; after filtering out patients with missing data (seven) and those without histologically confirmed necrotizing fasciitis (12), 115 patients remained. These patients were treated with early-initiation antibiotic therapy and aggressive surgical intervention once the diagnosis was suspected. Demographic data, clinical features, laboratory results, and treatment variables were identified. The median age was 56 years and 42% of patients were female. Of the 115 patients analyzed, 15% (17) died in the hospital. Univariate and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed due to the low number of mortality events seen in this cohort. Results The demographic factors associated with in-hospital mortality were older age (median: 64 years for nonsurvivors [interquartile range (IQR) 57-79] versus 55 years for survivors [IQR 45-63]; p = 0.002), coronary artery disease (odds ratio 4.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51 to 14]; p = 0.008), chronic kidney disease (OR 4.92 [95% CI 1.62 to 15]; p = 0.006), and transfer from an outside hospital (OR 3.47 [95% CI 1.19 to 10]; p = 0.02). The presenting clinical characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality were positive initial blood culture results (OR 4.76 [95% CI 1.59 to 15]; p = 0.01), lactic acidosis (OR 4.33 [95% CI 1.42 to 16]; p = 0.02), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (OR 6.37 [95% CI 2.05 to 20]; p = 0.002). Laboratory values at initial presentation that were associated with in-hospital mortality were platelet count (difference of medians -136 [95% CI -203 to -70]; p < 0.001), serum pH (difference of medians -0.13 [95% CI -0.21 to -0.03]; p = 0.02), serum lactate (difference of medians 0.90 [95% CI 0.40 to 4.80]; p < 0.001), serum creatinine (difference of medians 1.93 [95% CI 0.65 to 3.44]; p < 0.001), partial thromboplastin time (difference of medians 8.30 [95% CI 1.85 to 13]; p = 0.03), and international normalized ratio (difference of medians 0.1 [95% CI 0.0 to 0.5]; p = 0.004). The LRINEC score was a poor predictor of mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.56 [95% CI 0.45-0.67]. Conclusions Factors aiding clinical recognition of necrotizing fasciitis are not consistently helpful in predicting mortality of this infection. Identifying patients with potentially compromised organ function should lead to aggressive and expedited measures for diagnosis and treatment. Future multicenter studies with larger populations and a standardized algorithm of treatment triggered by high clinical suspicion can be used to validate these findings to better help prognosticate this potentially fatal diagnosis. Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study.
机译:背景,坏死性筋膜炎是一种罕见的感染,具有迅速恶化和高死亡率。没有彻底评估与住院医生死亡率相关的因素。虽然已经描述了识别坏死性筋膜炎诊断的预测模型(例如坏死性筋膜炎的实验室风险指标[Lrinec]),但它们在预测死亡率的使用是有限的。问题/目的(1)在坏死性筋膜炎的患者中与住院死亡率有什么关系? (2)临床因素与住院中的死亡有关吗? (3)实验室值与住院中的死亡率有关吗? (4)是在预测死亡率方面有用的LRINEC得分吗?方法我们回顾性研究了10年期间在我们的第三次护理机构中对抗筋膜炎的所有患者。总而言之,鉴定了134名患者;在过滤缺失数据(七)的患者之后,没有组织学证实坏死性筋膜炎(12),仍然存在115名患者。这些患者患有早期引发抗生素治疗和一旦诊断诊断,患有侵略性的手术干预。确定了人口统计数据,临床特征,实验室结果和治疗变量。中位年龄为56岁,42%的患者是女性。在分析的115名患者中,在医院死亡15%(17)。由于该队列中看到的低死亡率事件,单变量和接收器操作特征分析。结果与院内死亡率相关的人口因子是年龄较大的(中位数:非Nonsurvivors [interlyly范围(IQR)57-79]与55年来幸存者[IQR 45-63]; p = 0.002),冠状动脉疾病(差距4.56 [95%置信区间(CI)1.51至14]; p = 0.008),慢性肾病(或4.92 [95%CI 1.62至15]; p = 0.006),并从外部医院转移(或3.47 [95%CI 1.19至10]; P = 0.02)。与住院内死亡相关的临床特征是阳性初始血液培养结果(或4.76 [95%CI 1.59至15]; P = 0.01),乳酸酸中毒(或4.33 [95%CI 1.42至16]; P = 0.02 )和多器官功能障碍综合征(或6.37 [95%CI 2.05至20]; p = 0.002)。与医院内死亡相关的初始介绍的实验室值是血小板计数(中位数-136 [95%CI -203至-70]; p <0.001),血清pH(中位数差-0.13 [95%ci) -0.21至-0.03]; p = 0.02),血清乳酸(中位数0.90 [95%ci 0.40至4.80]; p <0.001),血清肌酐(中位数1.93的差异[95%ci 0.65至3.44]; p <0.001),部分血栓形成时间(中位数8.30的差异[95%CI 1.85至13]; p = 0.03)和国际归一化比率(中位数0.1的差异[95%CI 0.0至0.5]; p = 0.004)。 LRINEC评分是死亡率的差,接收器操作特性曲线下的面积为0.56 [95%CI 0.45-0.67]。结论辅助防丧筋膜炎的临床认识的因素在预测这种感染的死亡率方面并不一致。识别有潜在受损的器官功能的患者应导致诊断和治疗的积极性和加速措施。通过高临床怀疑引发的较大种群和标准化治疗算法的未来多中心研究可用于验证这些发现,以更好地帮助预后致命诊断。 Evidencelevel III的水平,治疗研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号