【24h】

Flow cytometry PRA using lymphocyte pools from random donors

机译:使用随机供体的淋巴细胞池进行流式细胞术PRA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Pools of lymphocytes from carefully chosen donors have been used for flow cytometry (FC) panel reactive antibody (PRA) assays. We intended to devise an FC PRA assay using mixed lymphocyte pools from a large number of randomly selected donors (RD FC PRA) to accurately predict the likelihood of a positive HLA crossmatch. Methods: Lymphocyte pools were prepared from randomly selected donors (N = 120). %PRA was calculated based on the anti-IgG FITC histogram of the T cells. The proposed RD FIG PRA assay was assessed in comparison with the bead FIG PRA, antiglobulin-augmented CDC (AHG-CDC) PRA assay, and the expected %PRA calculated by summing up the antigen frequencies of the known specificities. Results: In 29 FIG crossmatch positive sera, the positivity rate for the bead FC, RD FC, and AHG-CDC PRA was 1,00, 100, and 79%, and the mean %PRA was 77% +/- 20%, 73% +/- 21%, and 33% +/- 33%, respectively. The RD FC %PRA was not significantly different from the bead FC %PRA (P = 0.205). In 19 sensitized patients with a negative FC crossmatch, the positivity rate was 21% using the RD FC PRA and 16% using the bead FC PRA, which suggested that both assays had similar abilities to detect low levels of HLA antibodies. Conclusions: The RD FC PRA assay allows easy panel preparation, reduces cost, and naturally reflects the probabilities of a positive crossmatch in the population to which the cadaveric donor belongs. Therefore, this, new assay is expected to be useful as another approach to determine the % PRA. (c) 2007 Clinical Cytometry Society.
机译:背景:来自精心挑选的供体的淋巴细胞池已用于流式细胞术(FC)面板反应性抗体(PRA)分析。我们打算设计使用来自大量随机选择的供体(RD FC PRA)的混合淋巴细胞池的FC PRA分析,以准确预测HLA交叉匹配为阳性的可能性。方法:从随机选择的供体(N = 120)中制备淋巴细胞。基于T细胞的抗IgG FITC直方图计算%PRA。拟议的RD FIG PRA分析与珠FIG PRA,抗球蛋白增强的CDC(AHG-CDC)PRA分析以及通过合计已知特异性抗原频率计算得出的预期%PRA进行了评估。结果:在29 FIG交叉匹配阳性血清中,珠子FC,RD FC和AHG-CDC PRA的阳性率分别为1,00、100和79%,平均%PRA为77%+/- 20%,分别为73%+/- 21%和33%+/- 33%。 RD FC%PRA与磁珠FC%PRA无显着差异(P = 0.205)。在19名FC交叉匹配阴性的致敏患者中,使用RD FC PRA的阳性率为21%,使用珠子FC PRA的阳性率为16%,这表明这两种检测方法具有相似的检测低水平HLA抗体的能力。结论:RD FC PRA测定法可轻松进行专家组准备,降低成本,并自然反映出尸体捐献者所属人群中出现正错配的可能性。因此,这种新的检测方法有望用作确定PRA百分比的另一种方法。 (c)2007临床细胞计数学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号