首页> 外文期刊>Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation >Comparison of voice-use profiles between elementary classroom and music teachers.
【24h】

Comparison of voice-use profiles between elementary classroom and music teachers.

机译:基本教室和音乐老师之间语音使用情况的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Among teachers, music teachers are roughly four times more likely than classroom teachers to develop voice-related problems. Although it has been established that music teachers use their voices at high intensities and durations in the course of their workday, voice-use profiles concerning the amount and intensity of vocal use and vocal load have neither been quantified nor has vocal load for music teachers been compared with classroom teachers using these same voice-use parameters. In this study, total phonation time, fundamental frequency (F), and vocal intensity (dB SPL [sound pressure level]) were measured or estimated directly using a KayPENTAX Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (KayPENTAX, Lincoln Park, NJ). Vocal load was calculated as cycle and distance dose, as defined by Svec et al (2003), which integrates total phonation time, F, and vocal intensity. Twelve participants (n = 7 elementary music teachers and n = 5 elementary classroom teachers) were monitored during five full teaching days of one workweek to determine average vocal load for these two groups of teachers. Statistically significant differences in all measures were found between the two groups (P < 0.05) with large effect sizes for all parameters. These results suggest that typical vocal loads for music teachers are substantially higher than those experienced by classroom teachers (P < 0.01). This study suggests that reducing vocal load may have immediate clinical and educational benefits in vocal health in music teachers.
机译:在教师中,音乐老师出现与语音有关的问题的可能性大约是课堂老师的四倍。尽管已经确定音乐教师在工作过程中会以较高的强度和持续时间使用声音,但是关于声音使用量和强度以及声音负载的声音使用配置文件尚未量化,音乐老师的声音负载也没有被量化与使用相同语音使用参数的课堂教师相比。在这项研究中,总发声时间,基本频率(F)和人声强度(dB SPL [声压级])是使用KayPENTAX动态语音监听器(KayPENTAX,林肯公园,新泽西州)直接测量或估算的。如Svec等人(2003年)所定义的那样,将声负荷计算为周期和距离剂量,该剂量将总发声时间,F和声音强度进行了积分。在一个工作周的五个完整教学日中,对十二名参与者(n = 7名基础音乐老师和n = 5初级课堂老师)进行了监测,以确定这两类教师的平均声乐负荷。两组之间所有指标的统计学差异均具有统计学意义(P <0.05),所有参数的效应值均较大。这些结果表明,音乐教师的典型声音负荷明显高于课堂教师所承受的声音负荷(P <0.01)。这项研究表明,降低声带负荷可能对音乐教师的声带健康具有直接的临床和教育益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号