...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Using assessing care of vulnerable elders quality indicators to measure quality of hospital care for vulnerable elders.
【24h】

Using assessing care of vulnerable elders quality indicators to measure quality of hospital care for vulnerable elders.

机译:使用评估弱势老年人的护理质量指标来衡量弱势老年人的医院护理质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of care for hospitalized vulnerable elders using measures based on Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) quality indicators (QIs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects aged 65 and older hospitalized on the University of Chicago general medicine inpatient service who were defined as vulnerable using the Vulnerable Elder Survey-13 (VES-13), a validated tool based on age, self-reported health, and functional status. MEASUREMENTS: Inpatient interview and chart review using ACOVE-based process-of-care measures referring to 16 QIs in general hospital care and geriatric-prevalent conditions (e.g., pressure ulcers, dementia, and delirium); adherence rates calculated for type of care process (screening, diagnosis, and treatment) and type of provider (doctor, nurse). RESULTS: Six hundred of 845 (71%) older patients participated. Of these, 349 (58%) were deemed vulnerable based on VES-13 score. Three hundred twenty-eight (94%) charts were available for review. QIs for general medical care were met at a significantly higher rate than for pressure ulcer care (81.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=79.3-83.7% vs 75.8%, 95% CI=70.5-81.1%, P=.04) and for delirium and dementia care (81.5%, 95% CI=79.3-83.7 vs 31.4% 95% CI=27.5-35.2%, P<.01). According to standard nursing assessment forms, nurses were responsible for high rates of adherence to certain screening indicators (pain, nutrition, functional status, pressure ulcer risk; P<.001 when compared with physicians), although in patients with functional limitations, nurse admission assessments of functional limitations often did not agree with reports of limitations by patients on admission. CONCLUSION: Adherence to geriatric-specific QIs is lower than adherence to general hospital care QIs. Hospital care QIs that focus on screening may overestimate performance by detecting standard nursing or protocol-driven care.
机译:目的:使用基于对弱势老年人的护理评估(ACOVE)质量指标(QIs)的措施,评估住院弱势老年人的护理质量。设计:前瞻性队列研究。地点:单一学术医疗中心。参与者:芝加哥大学普通医学住院患者住院的65岁及65岁以上的受试者使用易受伤害的老年人调查13(VES-13)定义为易受伤害的对象,该工具是根据年龄,自我报告的健康状况和功能状态进行验证的工具。测量方法:使用基于ACOVE的护理过程方法对住院患者进行的访谈和图表复查,涉及一般医院护理和老年病(例如褥疮,痴呆和del妄)中的16个QI;根据护理过程类型(筛查,诊断和治疗)和提供者类型(医生,护士)计算的依从率。结果:845名老年患者中有600名(71%)参加了研究。其中,根据VES-13分数,有349(58%)被认为是脆弱的。三百二十八(94%)的图表可供审查。与压力性溃疡护理相比,普通医疗护理的QIs显着更高(81.5%,95%置信区间(CI)= 79.3-83.7%,而75.8%,95%CI = 70.5-81.1%,P = .04 )和del妄和痴呆症护理(81.5%,95%CI = 79.3-83.7 vs 31.4%95%CI = 27.5-35.2%,P <.01)。根据标准的护理评估表,护士对某些筛查指标(疼痛,营养,功能状态,压疮风险;与医生相比,P <.001)的高遵守率负责,尽管在功能受限的患者中,护士入院功能限制的评估常常与患者入院时限制的报道不一致。结论:对老年患者QI的依从性低于对一般医院护理QI的依从性。专注于筛查的医院护理质量指数可能会通过检测标准护理或协议驱动的护理而高估表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号