首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education >Problem-Based Learning and Assessment in Hydrology Courses: Can Non-Traditional Assessment Better Reflect Intended Learning Outcomes?
【24h】

Problem-Based Learning and Assessment in Hydrology Courses: Can Non-Traditional Assessment Better Reflect Intended Learning Outcomes?

机译:水文学课程中基于问题的学习和评估:非传统评估可以更好地反映预期的学习成果吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hydrology has at its core a focus on real-world applications and problems stemming from the importance of water for society and natural systems. While hydrology is firmly founded in traditional “hard” sciences like physics and mathematics, much of the innovation and excitement in current and future research-oriented hydrology comes through intersection with other disciplines. This leads to combinations of intended learning outcomes (ILOs) in hydrology courses that may not be easily or completely achieved using traditional lecture-based learning environments or using basic problem-solving techniques. Problem-based learning (PBL) may work well in hydrology courses due to the focus on real-world applications and cross-discipline nature of modern hydrology. Since PBL differs from traditional teacher-centered approaches, student learning must be supported and assessed differently. This article focuses on identifying several non-traditional assessment forms to help facilitate the use of PBL approachesin hydrology courses. We present an example hydrology modeling course employing one such non-traditional PBL-specific form of assessment. Further, we seek to test the hypothesis that non-traditional assessment associated with PBL better reflects the ability of the students to achieve the ILOs in such courses. Results from the example course considered indicate that students not only preferred but also performed better in a PBL environment with its non-traditional form of assessment. This makes a strongcase for incorporating both PBL and associated non-traditional forms of assessment into our teaching in hydrology and other applied science courses.
机译:水文学的核心是关注现实世界的应用以及由于水对社会和自然系统的重要性而产生的问题。尽管水文学已经建立在诸如物理学和数学之类的传统“硬”科学的牢固基础之上,但当前和未来以研究为导向的水文学的许多创新和兴奋都来自与其他学科的交汇。这导致了水文学课程中预期学习成果(ILO)的组合,使用传统的基于讲座的学习环境或使用基本的问题解决技术可能无法轻松或完全实现。基于问题的学习(PBL)在水文学课程中可能会很好地发挥作用,因为它着重于现实应用和现代水文学的跨学科性质。由于PBL与传统的以教师为中心的方法不同,因此必须以不同的方式支持和评估学生的学习。本文重点介绍确定几种非传统评估形式,以帮助促进在水文学课程中使用PBL方法。我们提供了一个采用非传统PBL形式的评估形式的水文建模课程示例。此外,我们试图检验以下假设:与PBL相关的非传统评估更好地反映了学生在此类课程中实现国际劳工标准的能力。所考虑的示例课程的结果表明,在PBL环境中,学生不仅喜欢而且还具有非传统形式的评估,因此表现更好。这为将PBL和相关的非传统评估形式纳入我们的水文学和其他应用科学课程的教学提供了有力的依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号