...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cereal Science >Statistical comparison of a new rheological method for defining changes in mash consistency during mashing with the established Rapid Visco Analyser.
【24h】

Statistical comparison of a new rheological method for defining changes in mash consistency during mashing with the established Rapid Visco Analyser.

机译:使用已建立的Rapid Visco Analyser分析确定糖化过程中糖化稠度变化的新流变方法的统计比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The determination of mash consistency proved to be difficult but is of great importance particularly with regard to process and quality control. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a new rheological method for precisely determining changes in mash consistency occurring during the mashing process. For that purpose, five mashes with various levels of unmalted oats (0-40%) have been analyzed using a Physica MCR rheometer equipped with a paddle-shaped rotor enabling mash particles to be kept in suspension throughout the rheological measurement. For validating this new method, a statistical comparison with the established Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) has been carried out. For this purpose, the mash consistency curves have been described by regression functions with the aim to determine characteristic curve points mathematically correct. As a result, the start and end point of starch gelatinization/liquefaction have been well-defined. By calculating the coefficients of determination, good to very good linear correlations between respective curve values and adjunct levels have been found for both methods (MCR and RVA). By calculating the repeatability, however, it has been revealed that the precision of the MCR method is significantly better than that of the RVA method
机译:证明糊状稠度的确定是困难的,但是特别是在过程和质量控制方面是非常重要的。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种新的流变方法,以精确确定糖化过程中发生的糖浆稠度变化。为此,已使用配备桨形转子的Physica MCR流变仪分析了五种含不同水平的麦芽麦芽(0-40%)的浆,使整个流变学测量中的浆颗粒保持悬浮状态。为了验证该新方法,已与建立的快速粘度分析仪(RVA)进行了统计比较。为此,已经通过回归函数描述了糖浆稠度曲线,目的是确定数学上正确的特征曲线点。结果,淀粉糊化/液化的起点和终点已被明确定义。通过计算确定系数,已发现两种方法(MCR和RVA)各自的曲线值和辅助电平之间的线性相关性非常好。但是,通过计算重复性,发现MCR方法的精度明显优于RVA方法的精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号