首页> 外文期刊>Drug safety: An international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience >Hepatotoxicity with thiazolidinediones: is it a class effect?
【24h】

Hepatotoxicity with thiazolidinediones: is it a class effect?

机译:噻唑烷二酮类药物的肝毒性:这是一种类效应吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Decreased insulin sensitivity plays a major role in various human diseases. particularly type 2 diabetes mellitus, and is associated with a higher risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular complications. Thiazolidinediones, more commonly termed glitazones, are the first drugs to specifically target muscular insulin resistance. They have proven efficacy for reducing plasma glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with diet alone, sulphonylureas, metformin or insulin. In addition, they are associated with some improvement of the cardiovascular risk profile. However, troglitazone, the first compound approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the US, proved to be hepatotoxic and was withdrawn from the market after the report of several dozen deaths or cases of severe hepatic failure requiring liver transplantation. It remains unclear whether or not hepatotoxicity is a class effect or is related to unique properties of troglitazone. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, two other glitazones, appear to have similar efficacy with regard to blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as compared with troglitazone. In controlled clinical trials, the incidence of significant (> or =3 x upper limit of normal) increases in liver enzyme levels (ALT in particular) was similar with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone as compared with placebo, whereas troglitazone was associated with a 3-fold greater incidence. In contrast to the numerous case reports of acute liver failure in patients receiving troglitzone, only a few case reports of hepatotoxicity have been reported in patients treated with rosiglitazone until now, with a causal relationship remaining uncertain. Furthermore, no single case of severe hepatotoxicity has been reported yet with pioglitazone. It should be mentioned that troglitazone, unlike pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, induces the cytochrome P450 isoform 3A4, which is partly responsible for its metabolism, and may be prone to drug interactions. Importantly enough, obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus are associated with liver abnormalities, especially non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, independent of any pharmacological treatment. This association obviously complicates the selection of patients who are good candidates for a treatment with glitazones as well as the monitoring of liver tests after initiation of therapy with any thiazolidinedione compound. While regular monitoring of liver enzymes is still recommended and more long term data are desirable, current evidence from clinical trials and postmarketing experience in the US supports the conclusion that rosiglitazone and pioglitazone do not share the hepatotoxic profile of troglitazone.
机译:胰岛素敏感性降低在各种人类疾病中起主要作用。特别是2型糖尿病,并且与动脉粥样硬化和心血管并发症的高风险相关。噻唑烷二酮,通常被称为格列酮类,是专门针对肌肉胰岛素抵抗的首批药物。已证明它们具有降低单独饮食,磺脲类,二甲双胍或胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者血浆葡萄糖水平的功效。此外,它们与心血管风险特征的改善有关。但是,曲格列酮是美国食品药品监督管理局批准的第一种化合物,具有肝毒性,在有数十例死亡或需要肝移植的严重肝衰竭病例报道后,撤出了市场。尚不清楚肝毒性是否为类效应或与曲格列酮的独特性质有关。罗格列酮和吡格列酮是另外两种格列酮,与曲格列酮相比,在2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制方面似乎具有相似的功效。在对照临床试验中,与安慰剂相比,罗格列酮或吡格列酮的肝酶水平(特别是ALT≥3或正常上限)显着增加(尤其是ALT上限)的发生率与安慰剂相似,而曲格列酮的发生率是安慰剂的3倍发生率更高。与接受曲格列酮治疗的患者发生大量急性肝衰竭的病例报告相反,迄今为止,仅报道了罗格列酮治疗的患者发生肝毒性的几例,其因果关系尚不确定。此外,吡格列酮尚无单例严重肝毒性的报道。应当指出,曲格列酮与吡格列酮和罗格列酮不同,可诱导细胞色素P450同工型3A4,这部分负责其代谢,并且可能易于发生药物相互作用。足够重要的是,肥胖,胰岛素抵抗和2型糖尿病与肝脏异常有关,尤其是非酒精性脂肪性肝炎,与任何药物治疗无关。这种联系显然使选择使用格列酮治疗的好候选人以及在开始用任何噻唑烷二酮类化合物治疗后监测肝试验的患者复杂化。尽管仍建议定期监测肝酶,并且需要长期数据,但美国临床试验和上市后经验的最新证据支持罗格列酮和吡格列酮不具有曲格列酮的肝毒性特征的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号