首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Precision and accuracy of the measurement of antiepileptic drugs in South Africa.
【24h】

Precision and accuracy of the measurement of antiepileptic drugs in South Africa.

机译:南非抗癫痫药物测定的准确性和准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The accuracy and the precision with which a drug concentration is quantified in the blood has a significant impact on the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the drug. In the absence of a system of accreditation of laboratories in South Africa, this study was designed to compare the accuracy and the precision of the measurement of antiepileptic drugs by 24 South African laboratories with those of non-South African laboratories that participate in the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UKNEQAS). Three test samples, containing a range of concentrations of phenytoin, valproate, carbamazepine, and phenobarbitone spiked into newborn calf serum were distributed to participating laboratories, which were asked to measure the serum concentrations using their routine assay method. Coefficients of variation were used to assess precision of measurements, and the percentage difference of the consensus mean from the spike value was used as an assessment of accuracy. There was comparable precision in the measurements for both the South African and the non-South African groups. However, there appeared to be a difference in the accuracy of measurement between the two groups. It was noted that the majority (77%) of the South African laboratories used the Abbott fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) with TDx analyzers (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA). Further analysis of the results of the South African and UKNEQAS subgroups using the FPIA technique showed a reduction in statistic bias, suggesting that part of the explanation for the statistic difference in the accuracy may be an intertechnique bias related to the use of a nonhuman matrix for sample preparation. Additional studies are required to determine other causes for the statistic differences in accuracy. However, the differences in accuracy are unlikely to be of clinical significance.
机译:血液中药物浓度定量的准确性和精确度对药物的治疗性药物监测(TDM)具有重要影响。在缺乏南非实验室认可体系的情况下,本研究旨在比较24个南非实验室与参加联合王国调查的非南非实验室的抗癫痫药测定的准确性和精密度。国家外部质量评估计划(UKNEQAS)。将三个浓度范围广泛的苯妥英钠,丙戊酸,卡马西平和苯巴比妥掺入新生小牛血清中的三个测试样品分配给参与的实验室,要求他们使用常规测定方法测量血清浓度。使用变异系数来评估测量的准确性,并使用与峰值之间的共识平均值的百分比差异来评估准确性。南非和非南非人群的测量精度相当。但是,两组之间的测量精度似乎有所不同。注意到大多数南非实验室(77%)使用带有TDx分析仪(美国伊利诺伊州阿伯特公园的阿伯特实验室)的雅培荧光偏振免疫测定法(FPIA)。使用FPIA技术对南非和UKNEQAS子组的结果进行的进一步分析表明,统计偏差有所减少,这表明对统计差异准确性的部分解释可能是与使用非人类矩阵相关的技术偏差。样品制备。需要进行其他研究来确定准确性差异的其他原因。但是,准确性的差异不太可能具有临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号