首页> 外文期刊>Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action >Using the Delphi and snow card techniques to build consensus among diverse community and academic stakeholders
【24h】

Using the Delphi and snow card techniques to build consensus among diverse community and academic stakeholders

机译:使用Delphi和Snow Card技术在社区和学术利益相关者之间建立共识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The New York University- New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (NYU-HHC) Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) used a communitybased participatory research (CBPR) and consensus-building approach among its community advisory board (CAB) and steering committee (SC) members to formulate research priorities to foster shared research collaborations. Methods: The Delphi technique is a methodology used to generate consensus from diverse perspectives and organizational agendas through a multi-method, iterative approach to collecting data. A series of on-line surveys was conducted with CAB members to identify health and research priorities from the community perspective. Subsequently, CAB and SC members were brought together and the snow card approach was utilized to narrow to two priority areas for shared research collaborations. Results: Cardiovascular disease (CVD)/obesity and mental health were identified as health disparity areas for shared research collaborations within a social determinants framework. In response, two workgroups were formed with leadership provided by three co-chairs representing the three constituents of the NYU-HHC CTSI: NYU faculty, HHC providers, and community leaders Conclusions: The Delphi approach fostered ownership and engagement with community partners because it was an iterative process that required stakeholders' input into decision making. The snow card technique allowed for organizing of a large number of discrete ideas. Results have helped to inform the overall CTSI research agenda by defining action steps, and setting an organizing framework to tackle two health disparity areas. The process helped ensure that NYUHHC CTSI research and community engagement strategies are congruent with community priorities.
机译:背景:纽约大学-纽约市卫生和医院公司(NYU-HHC)临床与转化科学研究所(CTSI)在其社区顾问委员会(CAB)和指导中使用了基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)和建立共识的方法委员会(SC)成员制定研究重点,以促进共享研究合作。方法:Delphi技术是一种用于通过多种方法,反复的方法来收集数据,从而从不同的观点和组织议程中产生共识的方法。与CAB成员进行了一系列在线调查,以从社区的角度确定健康和研究重点。随后,CAB和SC成员聚集在一起,并采用了“雪卡”方法将范围缩小到两个优先领域,以开展共​​同的研究合作。结果:在社会决定因素框架内,心血管疾病(CVD)/肥胖症和心理健康被确定为共享研究合作的健康差距领域。作为回应,由代表纽约大学-HHC CTSI的三个组成部分的三位共同主席组成的领导小组组成了两个工作组:纽约大学的教职员工,HHC提供者和社区领导者结论:德尔福方法促进了主人翁精神和与社区合作伙伴的参与,因为一个需要利益相关者参与决策的迭代过程。雪卡技术可以组织大量离散的想法。通过定义行动步骤并建立组织框架以解决两个健康差异领域,研究结果有助于告知CTSI总体研究议程。该过程有助于确保NYUHHC CTSI的研究和社区参与策略与社区优先事项相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号