...
【24h】

Introduction

机译:介绍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To return to the question of what is different in the South Asian history of technology, one can perhaps reiterate that the technology stories from India mirror the range of conventions within which much of South Asian historiography has come to rest. These are visible in a sustained analysis of how technology is caught up in colonial relations; an attention to development and modernization through a scrutiny of the new socio-economic order that the postcolonial state has sought to build; a focus on the subjectivities of classes and identities; and an attention to global flows of knowledge and frictions they encounter.42 Writing within those conventions, the contributions to this issue reflect the methodological eclecticism, theoretical debts, and the ethical commitment to asking questions of exclusion that are considered routine in South Asia. Given such commitments, it is then no surprise that scholars of South Asian technology do not stop by simply demonstrating that technology is an instrument for domination. Indeed, that is where the analysis starts to shape up. This changing thrust of analytical work is apparent in decreasing interest in "introduction" of new technologies by the colonial authorities or in any straightforward narrative of "transfer" of technology or "technological assistance" from the global north. Instead, scholars have invested their energy in exploring the specific ways the colonial context or the postcolonial condition facilitated the operation of power and met with subversive acts. Similarly, they routinely start by going behind the claims of modernization and development by embedding their analysis of the latter tropes in questions of resource distribution and claims of justice. There are now specialist STS journals open to embracing key innovations of South Asian historiography. Within U.S. aca-demia, there is a critical mass of scholars who are willing to attend to crossover interests. The timing could not be better for historians to harness the productive tension of concepts and methods in STS and South Asian Studies. Tapping into the generative potential of such tensions is the goal of this volume.
机译:回到南亚技术史上有何不同的问题,也许可以重申,印度的技术故事反映了南亚史学中许多已经搁置的惯例范围。在对技术如何融入殖民关系的持续分析中可以看到这些。通过审查后殖民国家寻求建立的新的社会经济秩序,关注发展和现代化;重点关注阶级和身份的主观性; 42在这些公约中撰写的文章中,对这一问题的贡献反映了方法论上的折衷主义,理论上的欠缺以及对提出排外性问题的道德承诺,这些问题在南亚被视为例行公事。有了这样的承诺,那么南亚技术学者就不会仅仅通过证明技术是一种统治手段而停下来。确实,这就是分析开始成形的地方。分析工作的这种不断变化的主旨,显然是由于对殖民当局“引进”新技术的兴趣减少,或者来自全球北部对技术“转让”或“技术援助”的任何直接叙述。取而代之的是,学者们投入了精力探索殖民环境或后殖民条件促进权力运作并遭遇颠覆行为的具体方式。同样,他们通常将对后一种观点的分析嵌入到资源分配和正义主张的问题中,从而落后于现代化和发展的主张。现在有STS专业期刊开放接受南亚史学的重大创新。在美国学术界,有大量的学者愿意参加交叉研究。对于历史学家来说,利用STS和南亚研究中概念和方法的生产张力的时机再合适不过了。探究这种紧张关系的产生潜力是本卷的目标。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology and Culture》 |2019年第4期|933-952|共20页
  • 作者

    PRAKASH KUMAR;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号