...
首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of engineering education >Development of Critical Reflection for Transformative Learning of Engineering Educators in a PBL-Based Professional Learning Program
【24h】

Development of Critical Reflection for Transformative Learning of Engineering Educators in a PBL-Based Professional Learning Program

机译:基于PBL的专业学习计划中工程教育者转型性学习的关键反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated how 35 Chinese university instructors developed and engaged in critical reflections in a six-month Problem-Based Learning (PBL) professional learning program in Denmark. Data sources included individual progressive portfolios, team-project reports, and focus group interview. Quantitative analysis indicated that participants developed significantly in content, process, and premise reflection in the domains of instructional knowledge and pedagogical knowledge. This result provides evidence for the effectiveness of using a PBL methodology to organize professional learning activities aiming for the development of critical reflection for transformative learning. Nevertheless, participants demonstrated little premise reflection regarding curricular knowledge, an area that demands more time and more systemic support. Qualitative analysis identified systemic, individual, and cultural factors constraining engineering teachers from critical reflection. The study also suggests that to facilitate premise reflection it takes longer than six months and demands more systemic support.
机译:本研究调查了35名中国大学教师在丹麦六个月的基于问题的学习(PBL)专业学习计划中开发和从事关键思考。数据来源包括个人逐行投资组合,团队项目报告和焦点组访谈。定量分析表明,参与者在教学知识和教学域中的内容,过程和前提下显着发展。这一结果提供了使用PBL方法的有效性来组织专业学习活动的证据,旨在为转型性学习的关键反思的发展。然而,参与者对课外​​知识进行了少量的前提反映,这是一个需要更多时间和更具系统性支持的区域。定性分析确定了系统,个人和文化因素,从批判反射中判断工程教师。该研究还表明,为了促进前提反映,需要超过六个月,并要求更多系统性支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号