首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >THE QUESTION OF EDUCATION SCIENCE: EXPERIMENTISM VERSUS EXPERIMENTALISM
【24h】

THE QUESTION OF EDUCATION SCIENCE: EXPERIMENTISM VERSUS EXPERIMENTALISM

机译:教育科学的问题:实验主义与实验主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The ascendant view in the current debate about education science — experi-mentism — is a throwback to the view that dominated at the outset of the "paradigm wars," some twenty years ago. The array and quality of arguments for and against it have changed little, if at all. Experimentists have simply reasserted the virtues of the randomized experiment and elevated it once again to the level of the "gold standard." In so doing, they have ignored, or failed to answer, long-standing and fundamental criticisms. Once again, quantitative-experimental methods are being advanced as the mark of scientific rigor. Once again, researchers are being admonished that scientific research can be — and should be — thoroughly insulated from politics. And once again, those who are critical of this perspective are faced with margmalization.
机译:当前关于教育科学的辩论中的主流观点是实验主义,是对二十年前“范式战争”开始时占主导地位的观点的一种回溯。支持和反对它的参数的数组和质量几乎没有变化。实验人员只是简单地重申了随机实验的优点,并将其再次提高到“黄金标准”的水平。在这样做时,他们忽略了或未能回答长期存在的基本批评。再次,定量实验方法被作为科学严谨的标志而发展。研究人员再次被告诫科学研究可以而且应该与政治彻底隔离。再一次,那些批评这种观点的人将面临马尔加里主义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2005年第3期|p.307-321|共15页
  • 作者

    Kenneth R. Howe;

  • 作者单位

    School of Education University of Colorado at Boulder;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:21:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号