首页> 外文期刊>CBE Life Sciences Education >Prevailing Questions and Methodologies in Biology Education Research: A Longitudinal Analysis of Research in CBE—Life Sciences Education and at the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research
【24h】

Prevailing Questions and Methodologies in Biology Education Research: A Longitudinal Analysis of Research in CBE—Life Sciences Education and at the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research

机译:生物教育研究中普遍存在的问题和方法:对 CBE-生命科学教育和生物教育研究学会的研究的纵向分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Biology education research (BER) is a growing field, as evidenced by the increasing number of publications in CBE—Life Sciences Education ( LSE ) and expanding participation at the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research (SABER) annual meetings. To facilitate an introspective and reflective discussion on how research within LSE and at SABER has matured, we conducted a content analysis of LSE research articles ( n = 339, from 2002 to 2015) and SABER abstracts ( n = 652, from 2011 to 2015) to examine three related intraresearch parameters: research questions, study contexts, and methodologies. Qualitative data analysis took a combination of deductive and inductive approaches, followed by statistical analyses to determine the correlations among different parameters. We identified existing research questions, study contexts, and methodologies in LSE articles and SABER abstracts and then compared and contrasted these parameters between the two data sources. LSE articles were most commonly guided by descriptive research questions, whereas SABER abstracts were most commonly guided by causal research questions. Research published in LSE and presented at SABER both prioritize undergraduate classrooms as the study context and quantitative methodologies. In this paper, we examine these research trends longitudinally and discuss implications for the future of BER as a scholarly field.
机译:生物学教育研究(BER)是一个不断发展的领域,这在CBE生命科学教育(LSE)上的出版物数量越来越多,并且在生物学教育研究学会(SABER)年度会议上的参与也越来越广泛。为了促进关于LSE和SABER内部研究的成熟的反思和反思,我们对LSE研究文章(2002年至2015年为339个)和SABER摘要(2011年至2015年为652个)进行了内容分析。研究三个相关的内部研究参数:研究问题,研究背景和方法。定性数据分析结合了演绎法和归纳法,然后进行统计分析以确定不同参数之间的相关性。我们在LSE文章和SABER摘要中确定了现有的研究问题,研究背景和方法,然后在两个数据源之间比较和对比了这些参数。 LSE文章最常见的是描述性研究问题,而SABER摘要最常见的是因果研究问题。在伦敦证券交易所(LSE)上发表并在SABER上发表的研究都将本科生课堂作为研究背景和定量方法,将其优先考虑。在本文中,我们纵向研究了这些研究趋势,并讨论了对BER作为学术领域的未来的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号