首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >First-person experience and yoga research: studying neural correlates of an intentional practice
【24h】

First-person experience and yoga research: studying neural correlates of an intentional practice

机译:第一人称体验和瑜伽研究:研究故意练习的神经相关性

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the scientific study of contemplative practices. While seated meditation practices have historically been at the center of inquiry in contemplative sciences, movement-based practices, such as yoga, t'ai chi, qigong, and others, are currently coming to the forefront of this discourse. In her introduction to the present Research Topic, Schmalzl et al. ( 2014 ) introduce movement-based contemplative practices (MBCP) and present their essential qualities: MBCPs are embodied and attentive to kinesthetic and proprioceptive sensations; are structured by intentional movement; and are contemplative, that is, characterized by deliberate observation and non-judgmental awareness. In this opinion paper, I focus on the necessity of studying intentional and experiential aspects of yoga as a MBCP, and on the role of first-person experiential reports in the neurophenomenological investigation of yoga and other MBCPs. I propose that the difference between yoga as a contemplative practice and yoga as a form of physical exercise needs to be assessed through nuanced investigation of subjective experience aimed at illuminating short- and long-term intentions and goals underlying yoga practice as well as dynamic variations within the lived experience of yoga. Embodiment and neurophenomenology Theories of embodiment, such as enaction (Thompson, 2005 , 2007 ; Noe, 2006 ; Stewart et al., 2010 ) stress the irreducible foundational links between the mind, the world and the body as conditions of possibility for consciousness. Rooted in the phenomenological tradition of Husserl ( 1982 ) and Merleau-Ponty many embodied mind theorists see movement not only as a pragmatic function of interacting with the world, but as a dynamic and plastic way of knowing and as a formative root of one's selfhood and subjectivity (Morris, 2004 , 2010 ). The concept of a “lived body,” derived from Merleau-Ponty ( 2012 ), reflects subjectivity conditioned by kinesthetic patterns and bodily habits throughout a lifetime. Yoga practice, in this view, consists of systematic change and of deconditioning of the “lived body” from its earlier habit patterns and creating new patterns and neural connections. Contemporary neurophysiological evidence lends support to the embodied mind approaches, placing sensorimotor “coupling” (Thompson and Varela, 2001 ) between an individual's moving body and the world at the center of research on subjective experience. Recent research on contemplative practices, predominantly focused on sitting meditation, has suggested a role of sustained contemplative training for processes of neuroplasticity (Manna et al., 2010 ), self-awareness (Vago and Silbersweig, 2012 ) attention modulation, (Lutz et al., 2008b ; MacLean et al., 2010 ), and emotion regulation (Lutz et al., 2008a ; Sahdra et al., 2011 ), among others. Studying yoga as a MBCP would highlight specific contributions of intentional and dynamic bodily processes to embodied cognition, including processes associated with intentional movement, attention to bodily states, and brain changes linked to variations in the experiential “lived body” and in underlying nervous system due to sustained physical and mental asana practice. Neurophenomenology (Varela, 1996 ; Lutz and Thompson, 2003 ) is the preferred method of inquiry for contemporary contemplative neurosciences and empirical studies of embodied and enactive cognition. The defining feature of neurophenomenology is the use of sophisticated objective neurophysiological measurements in conjunction with nuanced first-person methodologies. Within this framework, objective, and subjective data are seen as mutually constraining and informing, and dynamic methods of examining conscious experience are preferred. Despite a historical distrust of first-person reports by cognitive neuroscientists (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977 ), recent years have seen an important rise in the use of first-person methodologies both in the form of questionnaires and phenomenologically-informed practices (Chalmers, 1999 ). Cognitive neurosciences have gradually opened to the integration of systematic analysis of first-person reports (Overgaard et al., 2008 ), and a number of rigorous approaches to subjective data are now being developed. One methodology, known as “elicitation interview” (Petitmengin, 2006 ), has been used in a number of studies, including an investigation of epileptic aura (Petitmengin et al., 2006 ) and the generation of scientific insight (Petitmengin, 2007 ). Yoga as contemplative practice While the contemporary form of asana sequences of Hatha Yoga is relatively recent (Gard et al., 2014 ), many schools (such as Ashtanga Yoga and Iyengar Yoga) have referred to the ancient text, Patanjali's Yoga Sutra (Miller, 1995 ; White, 2014 ), as the philosophical source text defining and situating yoga practice on and off the mat. According to the much cited passage from the Yoga Sutra , the definiti
机译:简介近年来,沉思实践的科学研究得到了极大的发展。在冥想科学中,坐式冥想练习历来是研究的中心,而基于运动的练习(如瑜伽,太极拳,气功等)目前正成为这一话题的前沿。在Schmalzl等人对当前研究主题的介绍中。 (2014)引入了基于运动的沉思练习(MBCP)并展示了其基本素质:MBCP体现并关注动觉和本体感受。由故意运动构成;并且是沉思的,即具有刻意观察和非判断意识的特征。在这篇意见书中,我重点研究了将瑜伽作为MBCP研究故意和体验方面的必要性,以及第一人称体验报告在瑜伽和其他MBCP的神经现象学研究中的作用。我建议,应通过对主观经验进行细致的调查,以评估瑜伽作为一种沉思练习和一种体育锻炼之间的区别,这些主观经验旨在阐明瑜伽练习的短期和长期意图和目标以及其中的动态变化。瑜伽的真实体验。实施和神经现象学实施等理论,例如性行为(汤普森,2005年,2007年;诺伊,2006年;斯图尔特等人,2010年)强调了意识,世界和身体之间不可还原的基础联系,作为意识可能性的条件。扎根于胡塞尔(1982)和梅洛-庞蒂的现象学传统,许多有思想的思想理论家不仅将运动视为与世界互动的实用功能,而且将其视为动态的,可塑的认识方式,并成为人的自我形成和形成的根源。主观性(Morris,2004,2010)。源自Merleau-Ponty(2012)的“活体”概念反映了一生中受运动方式和身体习惯制约的主观性。在这种观点下,瑜伽练习包括系统的改变以及“活体”从其早期习惯模式的退化,以及创造新的模式和神经联系。当代的神经生理学证据为具体化的思维方式提供了支持,将感觉运动的“耦合”(Thompson和Varela,2001)置于个人移动的身体与世界之间,成为主观体验研究的中心。最近关于沉思练习的研究主要集中在坐着冥想上,表明持续沉思训练对神经可塑性(Manna等,2010),自我意识(Vago和Silbersweig,2012)注意力调节(Lutz等,2012)的作用。 (2008b; MacLean等,2010)和情绪调节(Lutz等,2008a; Sahdra等,2011)等。将瑜伽作为MBCP进行研究将突出意向性和动态身体过程对具体认知的特定贡献,包括与意向运动,对身体状态的关注以及与体验性“活体”和潜在神经系统变化相关的大脑变化相关的过程。持续的体式和精神体式练习。神经现象学(Varela,1996; Lutz和Thompson,2003)是当代沉思神经科学以及具体化和主动认知研究的首选查询方法。神经现象学的定义特征是结合细致的第一人称方法使用复杂的客观神经生理学测量。在此框架内,客观数据和主观数据被视为相互制约和相互启发,因此首选动态方法来检查意识体验。尽管历史上认知神经科学家对第一人称报告不信任(Nisbett and Wilson,1977),但近年来,无论是问卷还是现象学上的实践,第一人称方法的使用都出现了重要的增长(Chalmers,1999)。 )。认知神经科学已逐渐向整合第一人称报告的系统分析开放(Overgaard等,2008),并且目前正在开发多种严格的主观数据处理方法。一种方法被称为“启发式访谈”(Petitmengin,2006年),已用于许多研究中,包括对癫痫先兆的研究(Petitmengin等人,2006年)和产生科学见解(Petitmengin,2007年)。瑜伽是一种沉思练习虽然哈达瑜伽的当代形式的asana序列是相对较新的形式(Gard等,2014年),但许多学校(例如Ashtanga瑜伽和Iyengar瑜伽)都引用了古老的经文,即帕坦加利的瑜伽经(Miller, 1995年;怀特,2014年),作为定义和定位瑜伽练习在垫子上和垫子外的哲学原始资料。根据《瑜伽经》的引文,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号