首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Factors Associated with Home Fire Escape Plans in New South Wales: Multinomial Analysis of High-Risk Individuals and New South Wales Population
【2h】

Factors Associated with Home Fire Escape Plans in New South Wales: Multinomial Analysis of High-Risk Individuals and New South Wales Population

机译:新南威尔士州家庭火灾逃生计划的相关因素:高危人群和新南威尔士州人口的多项分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The preparation and practice of home-escape plans are important strategies for individuals and families seeking to reduce and/or prevent fire-related injury or death. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of and factors associated with, home-escape plans in the state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The study used data from two surveys—a 2016 fire safety attitudes and behaviour survey administered to high-risk individuals (n = 296) and a 2013 NSW health survey covering 13,027 adults aged 16 years and above. It applied multinomial logistic regression analyses to these data to identify factors associated with having a written home-fire escape plan, having an unwritten home-fire escape plan and not having any home-fire escape plan. The prevalence of written home-escape plans was only 4.3% (95% CI: 2.5, 7.5) for the high-risk individuals and 7.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3, 8.6) for the entire NSW population. The prevalence of unwritten escape plans was 44.6% (95% CI: 38.8, 50.5) for the high-risk individuals and 26.2% (95% CI: 25.1, 27.2) for the NSW population. The prevalence of no-escape plan at all was 51.1% (95% CI: 45.2, 56.9) for the high-risk individuals and 65.9% (95% CI: 64.8, 67.1) for the NSW population. After adjusting for other covariates, the following factors were found to be significantly associated with unwritten-escape plan and no-escape plan prevalence: speaking only the English language at home, practicing home-fire escape plans infrequently, being married, being female and testing smoke alarms less often. Future fire interventions should target people who speak only English at home and people who test their smoke alarms infrequently. These interventions should be accompanied by research aimed at reversing the trend toward use of more flammable materials in homes.
机译:对于试图减少和/或预防火灾造成的伤害或死亡的个人和家庭,家庭逃生计划的准备和实践是重要的策略。这项研究的目的是评估澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)的逃生计划的发生率以及与之相关的因素。该研究使用了两项调查的数据:一项针对高危人群(n = 296)的2016年消防安全态度和行为调查,以及一项针对13,027名16岁及以上成年人的2013年新南威尔士州健康调查。它对这些数据进行了多项Logistic回归分析,以识别与制定书面的家庭火灾逃生计划,制定书面的家庭火灾逃生计划以及不制定任何家庭火灾逃生计划相关的因素。高危人群的书面逃生计划的患病率仅为4.3%(95%CI:2.5,7.5),而整个新南威尔士州人口的患病率仅为7.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:7.3,8.6)。对于高危人群,未成文逃生计划的患病率是44.6%(95%CI:38.8,50.5),而对于新南威尔士州人口,则为26.2%(95%CI:25.1,27.2)。高危人群的无逃生计划患病率为51.1%(95%CI:45.2,56.9),而新南威尔士州人群为65.9%(95%CI:64.8,67.1)。在对其他协变量进行调整后,发现以下因素与未成文逃生计划和无逃生计划的患病率显着相关:仅在家里说英语,很少练习家庭火灾逃生计划,已婚,女性和测试减少烟雾警报的频率。未来的火灾干预措施应针对只在家里说英语的人和不经常测试烟雾报警器的人。这些干预措施应伴随着旨在扭转家庭中使用更多易燃材料的趋势的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号