首页> 外文会议>WateReuse Symposium >LIFE - CYCLE COST ASSESSMENT OF OCEAN - WATER DESALINATION FROM AMBIENT VS. WARM WATER SOURCES.
【24h】

LIFE - CYCLE COST ASSESSMENT OF OCEAN - WATER DESALINATION FROM AMBIENT VS. WARM WATER SOURCES.

机译:海洋水脱盐的生命周期成本评价温水源。

获取原文

摘要

Many proponents of large-scale ocean-water desalination have looked at co-location with power facilities as a potentially beneficial approach. Co-location could conceivably provide access to existing intake and discharge infrastructure, coastal land zoned for industrial/utility facilities, electric power and an ocean-water source which is warmed by the condensers of the power plant's once through cooling system. Sourcing feedwater for a desalination facility from the warm-water power plant discharge has been previously implemented in several full-scale facilities and received strong consideration for several projects under development. Of the reasons for consideration indicated above, most are very site specific. While the savings associated with use of existing intake and discharge infrastructure can be substantial (the costs associated with building new intake and discharge structures can exceed twenty- five percent of the total project cost), not all power plants have excess intake capacity available. Those that do are often abandoned structures from decommissioned power units requiring refurbishment. Finding land within a power plant site or adjacent to it can incur quite a range of costs. Regulations pertaining to the supply of power directly from a power plant to a desalination facility can in some locations be obstructive to cost savings. The ability to source warmed ocean-water from the power plant discharge is often cited as a benefit to a proposed project due to avoidance of constructing a new intake structure, no need to use intake capacity from the power plant, no additional draw of ocean-water beyond the existing power plant intake and perceived benefits to the operating costs of desalination resulting from the elevated temperature. While the impact of intake infrastructure cost should not and cannot be disregarded, the comprehensive consideration of the impacts of warm-water on the desalination process costs is enlightening. The principle that increased temperature increases water permeability of reverse osmosis (RO) membrane is widely understood and indeed results in lower operating pressure. However this is just part of the story when it comes to the impact of temperature on RO performance and the resulting cost of water production
机译:许多大型海水海水淡化的支持者已经看着与电力设施的共同位置,作为潜在的有益方法。同一地点可以想象提供访问现有的吸入和排出的基础设施,沿海土地划为工业/公用设施,电力和海洋水源这是由电厂的一旦通过冷凝器冷却系统加热。从热水发电厂出院的脱水设施采购进给水水已经以几种全规模设施实施,并为几个开发项目进行了强烈考虑。考虑的原因如上所述,大多数是特定的都是非常的。虽然与现有摄入和放电基础设施相关的节省可以很大(与建筑新的进气和放电结构相关的成本超过项目成本的25%),但并非所有发电厂都有过量的进气量。那些那些做的人经常被遗弃从需要翻新的退役电力单位的结构。在发电厂网站或附近找到土地可能会产生相当长的成本。在某些位置,直接从电厂供电的规定直接从发电厂到海水淡化设施可以节省成本妨碍。由于避免构建新的进气结构,源自发电厂放电从发电厂放电提供温暖的海水的能力通常被引用为拟议项目的益处,无需使用从电厂的进气容量,没有额外的海洋画除了升高的温度下,水超出现有电厂的摄入量和感知脱盐的运营成本。虽然进气基础设施成本的影响不应该且不能被忽视,但综合考虑温水对脱盐过程成本的影响是启示。温度增加的原理增加了反渗透(RO)膜的水渗透性被广泛理解,并且实际上导致较低的操作压力。然而,这只是故事的一部分,当涉及温度对RO性能的影响以及所产生的水产成本

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号