导管消融,射频电流

导管消融,射频电流的相关文献在2001年到2021年内共计242篇,主要集中在内科学、临床医学、基础医学 等领域,其中期刊论文242篇、专利文献170680篇;相关期刊5种,包括中国介入心脏病学杂志、中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志、中华老年多器官疾病杂志等; 导管消融,射频电流的相关文献由827位作者贡献,包括刘少稳、刘旭、张劲林等。

导管消融,射频电流—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:242 占比:0.14%

专利文献>

论文:170680 占比:99.86%

总计:170922篇

导管消融,射频电流—发文趋势图

导管消融,射频电流

-研究学者

  • 刘少稳
  • 刘旭
  • 张劲林
  • 张澍
  • 杜日映
  • 江洪
  • 董建增
  • 马长生
  • 刘兴鹏
  • 孙育民
  • 期刊论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

作者

    • 赵奕凯; 周鹏; 熊楠青; 顾文韬; 李慧洋; 吴帮卫; 罗心平; 程华胜; 李剑
    • 摘要: 目的 评价Columbus?三维心脏电生理标测系统指导下射频消融治疗房室结折返性心动过速的疗效和安全性.方法 40例行电生理检查证实为AVNRT的患者,随机分为Columbus? 三维标测消融组(三维组)和关闭三维定位功能的常规X线辅助消融组(二维组),每组各20例.使用Columbus?三维心脏电生理标测系统及其配套导管进行交界区改良治疗,比较两组即刻消融成功率、3个月随访成功率和不良事件发生情况,同时比较两组的X光曝光时间及射线剂量.结果 两组的即刻消融成功率均为100%;三维组3个月随访治愈率为95%,二维组为75%(P=0.182);两组均无不良事件发生;三维组的X射线曝光时间明显短于二维组[(219.00s±67.43)s vs(271.85±35.66)s,P=0.004];三维组的X射线曝光剂量明显低于二维组[72(54.50~115.5)mGy vs 110(85.35~142.5)mGy,P=0.046].结论 Columbus?三维心脏电生理标测系统及其配套消融导管能够有效标测交界区的电解剖结构并进行改良,在保证安全性的同时降低X射线曝光损害.
    • 欧振恒; 刘麟; 刘琮; 曾少颖
    • 摘要: 1例3岁10个月男性患儿因频发室性早搏入院行射频消融术,室性早搏12导联体表心电图提示胸前导联呈左束支传导阻滞图形,Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF导联主波向上,呈R型,aVL导联呈rs型,aVR导联深倒,呈QS型,QRS波时限约98 ms,术中根据消融导管的X线影像及三维电解剖证实为三尖瓣环12点钟位置起源,邻近希氏束.
    • 罗少玲; 刘洋; 林炜东; 吴书林; 詹贤章; 刘方舟; 薛玉梅; 廖洪涛; 方咸宏; 梁远红; 魏薇; 廖自立
    • 摘要: 目的 比较右侧希氏束旁室性早搏(简称室早)在三尖瓣瓣上与瓣下行导管射频消融的疗效性和安全性.方法 选择于2010年5月至2017年12月间在广东省人民医院接受射频消融术治疗的右侧希氏束旁室早患者.回顾分析病历资料,将在三尖瓣下进行射频消融的患者纳入瓣下组,在三尖瓣上进行射频消融的患者纳入瓣上组,收集患者临床基线、电生理资料及长期随访结果.结果 共50例纳入本研究,男性30例,女性20例.其中瓣下组21例,瓣上组29例.经导管射频消融治疗后,两组即时成功率无显著差别(90.5% vs 79.3%,P = 0.276).在随访中位时间为32个月后,瓣下组的远期成功率显著高于瓣上组(81.0% vs48.3%,P = 0.016).结论 射频消融是治疗右侧希氏束旁室早的有效手段;三尖瓣下消融治疗能显著提高患者的远期成功率.%Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of right side para-Hisian premature ventricular contractions (PH-PVCs),by positioning the ablation catheter under the septal leaflet of tricuspid valve(TV) to positioning the ablation catheter above the septal leaflet of tricuspid valve. Methods The study reviewed the patients suffered from PH-PVCs and treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation in Guangdong province cardiovascular institute between May 2016 and December 2017. Retrospective analysis of medical records,patients were categorized into ablation under the septal leaflet of TV group (un-TV group) and ablation above the septal leaflet of TV group (ab-TV group). The clinical baselines, electrophysiological profiles, prognostic data and complications were collected and analyzed. Results Fifty patients were enrolled in present study. Twenty-one patients were enrolled in un-TV group. During median follow-up of 32 months (1-89 months), PVC free survival was 62.0% in all the patients. The un-TV group (81.0% vs. 48.3%,P=0.016) significantly improved long-term PVC free survival. Conclusion The long-term outcome after un-TV ablation strategy of PH-PVCs is positive. The un-TV ablation strategy significantly improves long-term PVC free survival.
    • 周小雄; 刘方舟; 詹贤章; 薛玉梅; 廖洪涛; 方咸宏
    • 摘要: 目的 分析经左侧间隔部消融成功的房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT).方法 广东省人民医院心血管病研究所心血管内科2012年1月至2015年11月收治的经左侧间隔部消融成功的AVNRT8例,回顾性分析其导管射频消融的方法及特点.结果 8例患者中男性3例,女性5例,年龄(53.5±18.9)岁,术前均有反复发作的阵发性室上性心动过速病史,8例患者经右侧间隔部反复消融仍无法达到消融终点,其中5例经右侧间隔部消融后术后仍可诱发心动过速,3例有稳定的跳跃及连续回波现象,后分别经主动脉逆行或经房间隔穿刺行左侧间隔部消融取得成功,左侧消融放电次数(5.8±1.9)次,放电时间(47.9±16.2)s.结论 右侧间隔部消融无效的AVNRT,可能属左侧后延伸支参与的AVNRT,可通过左侧间隔部慢径区域消融治疗.
    • 陈英; 曹佳宁; 徐欣; 杨承健; 李勋
    • 摘要: 1例男性患者,57岁,Ebstein畸形,阵发性心悸20年.经电生理检查发现双旁道,分别位于右后间隔和右侧游离壁,分别于三尖瓣环4~5点和7~8点消融成功.
    • 邸成业; 万征; 丁燕生; 林文华
    • 摘要: Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of type "m" QRS morphology in lead I for ventricular arrhythmia.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 357 patients with successful radiofrequency ablation in our hospital.According to the successfully ablated target,the patients were divided into two groups:left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) group (Group A,n=139),right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) group (Group B,n=218).The case number of type "m" QRS morphology in lead I,the amplitude of QRS wave in lead I,the target position,and the target potential of the two groups were compared.Results ①In group A,9 cases with type m QRS morphology in lead I were recorded;in group B,30 cases with type m QRS morphology in lead I were recorded,the incidence rate of group B was larger than group A,with statistical difference(6.5% vs 13.8%,P<0.05).②QRS wave amplitude in group A was larger than group B in lead I,with statistical difference [(0.38±0.13) mV vs (0.21±0.13) mV,P<0.01],but there was no statistical difference of QRS wave duration in Lead I between the two groups [(129.0±29.4) ms vs (145.6±26.0) ms,P>0.05].③The successful ablated target position was located at the anterior side of RCC in group A and that was located at septal side of the junction between RVOT free wall and septal wall near the pulmonary valve in group B,with close anatomical position between the two groups.The V-QRS interval of group A was smaller than in group A that group B,with statistical difference[(31± 12.3) ms vs (21±5.7) ms,P<0.05].Conclusion Type "m" QRS morphoeogy in lead I in parients with outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia indicates that successful ablation target is at LCC/RCC junction,RCC anterior part,septal side of the junction between RVOT free wall and septal wall near the pulmonary valve.The RVOT origin is more often than LVOT origin,with close anatomical position between the two groups.%目的 探讨心电图Ⅰ导联QRS波形态呈m型在流出道室性心律失常(PVC)中的定位诊断价值.方法 回顾性分析成功行射频消融的流出道PVC患者357例,根据消融成功的心腔分为两组:左室流出道(LVOT)消融成功者(A组,n=139),右室流出道(RVOT)消融成功者(B组,n=218),比较两组患者心电图Ⅰ导联QRS波呈m型的例数、Ⅰ导联QRS波的振幅、靶点位置及靶点图电位特点.结果 ①A组患者9例Ⅰ导联QRS波形态呈m型,B组患者30例Ⅰ导联QRS波形态呈m型,发生率有显著差异(6.5% vs 13.8%,P<0.05).②两组患者Ⅰ导联QRS波振幅有显著差异[(0.38±0.13) mVvs (0.21±0.13) mV,P<0.01];两组患者Ⅰ导联QRS波时程差异无显著性[(129.0±29.4) ms vs (145.6±26.0) ms,P>0.05].③A组消融成功靶点位置位于RCC前部,B组消融成功靶点位置位于RVOT左侧肺动脉瓣附近游离壁、间隔交界处的间隔侧,两者靶点解剖位置相距较近.④两组靶点图V波提前QRS波程度有显著差异[(31±12.3) ms vs (21±5.7) ms,P<0.05].结论 流出道PVC的Ⅰ导联QRS波形态呈m型提示消融成功靶点位置在RCC前部,或RVOT左侧肺动脉瓣附近游离壁、间隔交界处的间隔侧,RVOT起源多于LVOT起源,且两者靶点解剖位置相距较近.
    • 李标; 陈弹; 潘婷婷; 张宇祯; 杨俊华; 惠杰; 杨向军
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨心房总传导时间(TACT)与阵发性心房颤动(简称房颤)导管射频消融术(RFCA)后复发的关系.方法 入选2012~2014年行RFCA的阵发性房颤患者116例,TACT测定即在术前基础心律为窦性心律时,脉冲多普勒采样容积放在二尖瓣环上的左房侧壁,从体表心电图Ⅱ导联P波的起始时间至组织多普勒追踪A'波波峰的时间(PA-TDI)间期,测定3个心动周期,取其平均值,术后3个月空白期后评定治疗效果并随访6个月.根据随访结果将患者分成复发组和未复发组.结果 随访结束,116例患者中29例(25%)患者复发,复发组TACT较未复发组长[(144±23)ms vs (124±20)ms,P<0.001)],多因素分析发现TACT是预测阵发性房颤RFCA术后复发的独立因素(OR=1.045,95%CI 1.021~1.073,P<0.001).结论 TACT可用于预测阵发性房颤射频消融术后复发.%Objective To investigate the relationship between total atrial conduction time(TATC) and recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).Methods 116 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent RFCA from 2012 to 2014 were enrolled in this study,when patients were in sinus rhythm before RFCA,TACT was estimated by measuring the time delay between the onset of the P-wave in lead Ⅱ of the surface electrocardiogram and the peak A-wave on the tissue Doppler tracing of the left atrial lateral wall (PA-TDI duration),3 cardiac cycles were measured and their mean values were determined.Clinical success was assessed after 3-month blanking period and all patients were follow-up for 6 months.According to the results of the follow-up,the patients were divided into recurrent group and unrecurrentgroup.Results In the end of follow-up period,29 patients(25%) suffered from recurrent AF.Univariate analysis showed that the mean TACT of the recurrent group of patients was longer than that of the unrecurrent group of patients[(144 ± 23) ms vs (124 ± 20) ms,P ≥ 0.001].Multivariable analysis revealed that TACT was an independent risk factor responsible for the recurrence of AF(OR=1.045,95 %CI 1.021-1.073,P≥0.001).Conclusion TACT can be used to predict the recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after RFCA.
    • 杜丹; 王祖禄
    • 摘要: 目的 研究起源于主动脉窦(ASC)的室性心律失常,包括特发性频发室性早搏和室性心动过速(PVCs/VT)的心电图特点、电生理特征和经射频导管消融治疗方法学.方法 15例频发PVCs/VT患者经右股静脉进右室流出道行最早激动顺序和起搏标测,消融不成功或失败的病例,采用经右股动脉途径行电生理检查,于心室及主动脉窦内标测PVCs/VT时最早心室激动(EVA),进行射频消融治疗,分析其体表心电图特点、电生理检查特征及经射频导管消融治疗结果.结果 15例PVCs/VT患者,1例患者PVCs于无冠窦内消融成功,其体表心电图Ⅰ导联为顿挫的R波,aVL为rSr波,消融靶点局部心室激动提前体表QRS波18 ms,放电1次4 s终止PVCs;余14例于左冠窦内标测到EVA,其体表心电图呈不典型左束支传导阻滞伴心电轴右偏,Ⅰ导联为QS、rsr、rs或rS波,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF导联为高振幅R波,V6均无S波,胸前导联R移行区12例位于V1~V3导联,仅2例位于V4导联,V1或V2导联R波时程指数≥50%者10例(71.4%)、R/S波幅指数≥30%者11例(78.6%).9例即刻消融成功者于左冠窦内标测到的EVA提前于体表心电图QRS波(EVA-QRS时间)(45.1±8.0)ms,而5例消融未成功者EVA-QRS时间为(26.4±5.9)ms(P<0.05).9例即刻消融成功者于消融靶点处可记录到位于PVCs/VT QRS波之前的高频低振幅电位(P1),窦性心律时于上述相同消融靶点处可记录到位于QRS波之后的高频低振幅电位(P2),于消融靶点处放电1~3次,3~10 s内终止PVCs/VT,消融后9例P2电位均延迟;5例消融未成功者,2例于标测到EVA部位记录到P1电位.随访6个月至8年,10例即刻消融成功患者无复发;另5例消融未成功者1例服用倍他乐克心悸症状明显改善,1例服用心得安,心悸发作次数明显减少;余3例患者症状无改善.1例于左冠窦内消融患者术后24 h出现严重心绞痛及心电图缺血改变,经药物治疗5天症状消失,余患者在围术期及长期随访中无手术相关合并症发生.结论 起源于ASC或其邻近组织的PVCs/VT,其体表心电图及电生理检查具有一定的特点,ASC内经射频导管消融可根治部分患者此类心律失常,应避免损伤冠状动脉.
    • 陶四明; 韩明华; 张新金; 郑甲林; 魏巍; 杨志刚
    • 摘要: 目的 评价多极接触标测在指导三维电解剖引导下右室流出道(RVOT)室性早搏(简称室早)消融的疗效.方法 选择32例RVOT室早患者,据术中室早发作的频度分为两组:室早<1次/分者采用多极导管高密度标测(多极组);室早≥1次/分者采用单导管逐点标测(单极组);确定激动起源靶点后再进行起搏标测证实并实施消融治疗.比较两组的标测时间、消融次数及时间、X线曝光时间、消融成功率.结果 29例患者完成电生理标测及消融,单极组16例,多极组13例.多极组平均采集有效标测点明显多于单极组;激动顺序标测耗时两组未见差异.多极组总手术时间明显长于单极组,但是在平均消融次数、消融时间、X线透视时间等指标比较,多极组却显著少于单极组,所有患者均达到即刻消融终点.随访(6.9±3.2)个月,单极组1例复发.结论 采用多极标测导管对RVOT局部进行高密度电解剖标测快捷、精确,提高消融成功率,尤其是对术中室早发作较少的患者.
    • 钟常青; 广洁丽; 张翼
    • 摘要: 目的 评价在低频率X线曝光下应用EnSite NavX三维标测系统引导射频消融房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)的安全性、有效性.方法 选择2011年4月至2015年2月在本院住院的阵发性室上性心动过速患者,经食管调搏筛选出103例AVNRT.将入选患者分为研究组61例和常规组42例.研究组低频率X线曝光下应用NavX指导消融,常规组X线透视消融.观察两组的手术成功率、手术操作时间、放电次数、放电时间、X线曝光时间和并发症.结果 研究组中2例经术中心内电生理检查诊断分别更正为房性心动过速和间隔旁道致房室折返性心动过速而剔除出组,其余研究组及常规组均成功完成手术.与常规组比较,研究组手术时间减少[(46.5±11.7)min vs(63.4±14.5)min,P<0.01],X线曝光时间明显缩短(192±103)s vs(413±112)s,P<0.01],放电次数显著减少[(3±1)次vs(7±2)次,P<0.01],放电时间显著缩短[(184±69)s vs(378±77)s,P<0.01].术中常规组发生1例房室传导阻滞.结论 低频率X线曝光下在EnSite NavX三维标测系统引导射频消融治疗AVNRT安全,在缩短X线曝光时间的同时提高了手术效率.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号