...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >The impact of previous fundoplication on laparoscopic gastric bypass outcomes: a case-control evaluation.
【24h】

The impact of previous fundoplication on laparoscopic gastric bypass outcomes: a case-control evaluation.

机译:先前胃底折叠术对腹腔镜胃旁路手术结局的影响:病例对照评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common comorbid condition in morbidly obese gastric bypass candidates. Unfortunately, some patients who ultimately present for bariatric surgery have previously undergone Nissen fundoplication for GERD. Many surgeons consider previous fundoplication to be a relative contraindication to subsequent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) due to increased technical complexity and risk. We sought to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of a cohort of patients who had first undergone fundoplication and ultimately chose to later pursue LRYGB for morbid obesity (revision) to matched control patients. METHODS: Data were obtained from our prospectively maintained bariatric surgery database. Patients who underwent laparoscopic takedown of a previous fundoplication and conversion to LRYGB were compared to control patients who underwent primary LRYGB. For every revision patient, two control subjects were randomly selected from the database after matching for preoperative body mass index and year of surgery. RESULTS: From July 2002 to April 2011, 14 patients underwent laparoscopic takedown of a previous Nissen fundoplication and then underwent LRYGB. During the same interval, 673 patients underwent LRYGB as a primary procedure for obesity from which 28 were selected as controls. There were no conversions to open laparotomy in any patient. Subjects were similar demographically. Operating time and duration of hospital stay were significantly longer in revision patients. Complications were more frequent in revisions (36% revisions vs. 7% controls, P = 0.03). Excess weight loss 1-year after surgery was excellent in both groups and did not differ (69% revision vs. 69.6% controls, P = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Although associated with longer operating times, longer duration of hospital stay, and complications, LRYGB after fundoplication is feasible and safe. Long-term weight loss outcomes are similar to those seen following primary LRYGB. Previous fundoplication is not a contraindication to LRYGB.
机译:背景:胃食管反流病(GERD)是病态肥胖的胃旁路病患者的常见合并症。不幸的是,一些最终参加减肥手术的患者先前曾接受过GERD的Nissen胃底折叠术。由于增加的技术复杂性和风险,许多外科医生认为先前的胃底折叠术是随后腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)的相对禁忌症。我们试图比较一组最初接受胃底折叠术并最终选择后来针对病态肥胖(修订版)进行LRYGB治疗(匹配)的患者的围手术期和长期结果。方法:数据来自我们前瞻性维护的减肥手术数据库。将接受先前胃底折叠术并转换为LRYGB的腹腔镜手术患者与接受原发LRYGB的对照患者进行比较。对于每个修订患者,在匹配术前体重指数和手术年份后,从数据库中随机选择两个对照对象。结果:从2002年7月至2011年4月,有14例患者接受了以前的Nissen胃底折叠术的腹腔镜切除术,然后接受了LRYGB治疗。在相同的时间间隔内,有673例患者接受了LRYGB肥胖的主要治疗,从中选择28例作为对照。没有任何患者可以进行开腹手术。受试者在人口统计学上相似。翻修患者的手术时间和住院时间明显更长。修订中并发症更为常见(修订率为36%,对照组为7%,P = 0.03)。两组术后一年的体重减轻都非常好,两组之间无差异(69%修订对比69.6%对照,P = 0.93)。结论:尽管胃底折叠术后LRYGB手术时间更长,住院时间更长,并发症更多,但仍可行且安全。长期减肥结局与原发LRYGB后所见相似。先前的胃底折叠术并不是LRYGB的禁忌症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号