首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic Region
【24h】

Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic Region

机译:佛得角地区保护计划中土地类别作为物种替代的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Land classes are often used in conservation planning as surrogates for species. The relationship between these surrogates and the distribution of species is usually assumed but rarely tested. Using broad habitat units (BHUs) to represent biodiversity pattern in the Cape Floristic Region, together with point locality data for species (proteas and selected vertebrates), we calculated the effectiveness of BHUs as surrogates for species. Our planning units were grid cells of about 40 km(2), together with boundaries of existing reserves. After assigning conservation targets to BHUs, we derived minimum sets of planning units to meet all targets and calculated irreplaceability values for all units (irreplaceability measures the likelihood of a unit being required to achieve targets). Results showed that BHUs were good surrogates for the majority of protea species, but were not good surrogates for vertebrate species or for a small subset of protea species. These species shared the following characteristics: rarity, limited ranges, Red Data Book status, specialised habitats not defined by BHUs, and distributions driven by historical rather than contemporary ecological factors. We show that targeting land classes and species simultaneously is a viable option and requires only 0.1-0.8% more land (depending on species targets) than targeting land classes alone. We conclude by recommending two different strategies for combining land class and species data in conservation planning, depending on data availability..
机译:土地类别通常在保护规划中用作物种的代用品。这些替代物与物种分布之间的关系通常是假定的,但很少经过检验。我们使用广阔的栖息地单位(BHUs)来表示佛得角海角地区的生物多样性模式,并结合物种(蛋白酶和选定的脊椎动物)的点局部数据,我们计算了BHUs作为物种替代物的有效性。我们的计划单位是大约40 km(2)的网格单元,以及现有保护区的边界。在为BHU分配保护目标后,我们得出了满足所有目标的最少计划单位集,并计算了所有单位的不可替代性值(不可替代性衡量的是达到目标所需的某个单元的可能性)。结果表明,对于大多数蛋白酶物种,BHU都是很好的替代物,但对于脊椎动物物种或一小部分蛋白酶来说,BHU并不是很好的替代物。这些物种具有以下特征:稀有性,范围有限,《红色数据手册》状态,BHU未定义的特殊栖息地以及由历史而非当代生态因素驱动的分布。我们表明,同时针对土地类别和物种是一种可行的选择,与仅针对土地类别相比,仅需要多0.1-0.8%的土地(取决于物种目标)。最后,我们根据数据的可用性,提出了两种不同的策略来结合土地类别和物种数据进行保护规划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号