...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Reliability and validity of the back performance scale: observing activity limitation in patients with back pain.
【24h】

Reliability and validity of the back performance scale: observing activity limitation in patients with back pain.

机译:背部表现量表的可靠性和有效性:观察背部疼痛患者的活动受限。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A single group design to examine reliability and validity of the Back Performance Scale. OBJECTIVES: To examine intertester reliability, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity of the Back Performance Scale. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Back Performance Scale is a condition-specific performance measure of activity limitation in patients with back pain. It includes five tests of daily activities requiring mobility of the trunk: sock test, pick-up test, roll-up test, fingertip-to-floor test, and lift test. Discriminative ability and responsiveness to important change have previously been demonstrated. METHODS: A total of 41 patients with back pain participated in the study. Two physiotherapists examined test performances concurrently, but independently. The patients filled in three questionnaires, two reflecting perceived disability (Der Funktionsfragenbogen Hannover, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) as well as one for fear avoidance of daily activities and work (Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire). One physiotherapist retested the patients after 2 to 3 days. RESULTS: Intertester agreement of the Back Performance Scale sum score was very high (intraclass correlation coefficient 2.1): 0.996. Within-patient standard deviation (sw) on the 16-point Back Performance Scale was very low: 0.25. Test-retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91, sw = 1.3). Intertester agreement of the separate tests was also very high, ranging from kappa= 0.90-1.00. Test-retest reliability was moderate to high (kappa= 0.55-0.83). A high correlation was demonstrated between the Back Performance Scale and the Der Funktionsfragenbogen Hannover: Spearman rho (rho) = 0.825, P < 0.01. Correlation between the Back Performance Scale and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was moderate: rho = 0.454, P < 0.01. No correlation was demonstrated between the Back Performance Scale and the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The Back Performance Scale appears to be a reliable and valid outcome measure of activity limitation.
机译:研究设计:一个小组设计,以检验背部绩效量表的可靠性和有效性。目的:检查测试者间的信度,重测信度和后绩效量表的并发有效性。背景数据摘要:背部表现量表是针对腰痛患者活动受限的特定条件表现量度。它包括五项需要后备箱活动的日常活动测试:袜子测试,提起测试,卷起测试,指尖到地板测试和提起测试。先前已经证明了对重要变化的区分能力和响应能力。方法:共有41例腰痛患者参加了研究。两名理疗师同时但独立地检查了测试性能。患者填写了三份问卷,其中两份反映了感觉上的残疾(Der Funktionsfragenbogen Hannover,Roland-Morris残疾问卷),另一份是关于避免日常活动和工作的恐惧(恐惧避免信念问卷)。 2-3天后,一名物理治疗师对患者进行了重新测试。结果:Back Performance Scale总得分的测试者之间的一致性非常高(类内相关系数2.1):0.996。 16点背部表现量表上的患者内部标准偏差(sw)非常低:0.25。重测信度很高(类内相关系数= 0.91,sw = 1.3)。单独测试的测试者间一致性也很高,kappa = 0.90-1.00。重测可靠性从中等到高(kappa = 0.55-0.83)。背部表现量表与汉诺威啤酒的功能之间存在高度相关性:Spearman rho(rho)= 0.825,P <0.01。背部绩效量表与Roland-Morris残疾问卷之间的相关性为中等:rho = 0.454,​​P <0.01。背部表现量表和恐惧回避信念问卷之间没有相关性。结论:背部绩效量表似乎是活动受限的可靠和有效的结果指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号