...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study.
【24h】

Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study.

机译:保守治疗或经皮椎体成形术治疗的49例急性/半骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的十二个月随访:一项临床随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical randomized study. OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is compared to conservative treatment in patients with acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures with respect to pain, physical and mental outcomes. The risk of vertebral fractures adjacent to treated levels is assessed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are some disagreements of the benefits of PVP for the treatment of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but the long-term clinical outcome of PVP compared to conservative treatment has not been evaluated in a randomized study. METHODS: The 3-months follow-up of this study has been published previously, and here we report the completed 12-months analysis. About 50 patients (41 females) were included from January 2001 until January 2008. Patients with vertebral fractures less than 8 weeks old were included and randomized to either PVP or conservative treatment. Pain was assessed with a visual analogue scale. Physical and mental outcomes were assessed by validated questionnaires and tests. Tests, questionnaires, and plain radiographs were performed at the inclusion and after 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Pain score before and after the operation in the PVP group was 7.9 and 2.0, respectively. There was no difference between the groups concerning pain at the 3- and 12-months follow-up. Supplementary assessment of back pain 1 month after discharge from hospital showed a significant lower VAS score in the PVP group over the conservative group. In the study period, 2 adjacent fractures in the PVP group and no adjacent fractures in the conservative group were registered. CONCLUSION: PVP is a good treatment for some patients with acute/subacute painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but the majority of fractures will heal after 8 to 12 weeks of conservative treatment with subsequent decline in pain. The risk of new fractures needs further research.
机译:研究设计:临床随机研究。目的:比较急性或亚急性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者在疼痛,身体和精神预后方面的经皮椎体成形术与保守治疗相比较。评估接近治疗水平的椎骨骨折风险。背景资料概述:PVP在治疗急性骨质疏松性椎体骨折方面的益处存在一些分歧,但是与保守治疗相比,PVP的长期临床疗效尚未在随机研究中进行评估。方法:这项研究的3个月随访已经在之前发表,在这里我们报告完成的12个月分析。从2001年1月至2008年1月,共纳入约50位患者(41位女性)。椎骨骨折的患者少于8周,被随机分为PVP或保守治疗。用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛。身体和精神结果通过经过验证的问卷和测试进行评估。在入选时以及3个月和12个月后进行测试,问卷调查和X光平片。结果:PVP组手术前后的疼痛评分分别为7.9和2.0。在3个月和12个月的随访中,两组在疼痛方面没有差异。出院后1个月的背痛补充评估显示,PVP组的VAS评分明显低于保守组。在研究期间,PVP组中有2处相邻骨折,而保守组中无相邻骨折。结论:PVP对某些急性/亚急性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者是一种很好的治疗方法,但是保守治疗8至12周后,大多数骨折都能he愈,并且疼痛减轻。新骨折的风险有待进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号