...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >A comparison of three methods of pain control for posterior spinal fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
【24h】

A comparison of three methods of pain control for posterior spinal fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

机译:青少年特发性脊柱侧弯后路脊柱融合术三种疼痛控制方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine alone, a single preoperative intrathecal morphine injection and PCA (IT/PCA), and epidural catheter infusion without PCA (EPI) for postoperative pain control after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and segmental spinal instrumentation (SSI) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative pain control after PSF and SSI in AIS can be managed in different ways. EPI provides for a longer period of pain relief but is reliant on the correct placement and maintenance of the catheter in the epidural space. A single preoperative intrathecal morphine injection also provides for long acting analgesia. No direct comparison of these 3 methods of postoperative pain control has been reported. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was performed at 2 institutions from 1997 to 2005. The medical record was reviewed to determine pain scores after surgery at multiple time periods. The 3 groups were compared using Student t test and chi and significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the gender, age, magnitude of curve, or number of levels fused in the IT/PCA (N = 42), PCA (N = 41), or EPI (N = 55) groups. Postoperative pain scores were lowest in the IT/PCA group in the first 8 hours (P < 0.05) but the pain scores in the EPI group were then lower through 24 hours (P < 0.05). Total morphine use (mg/kg) was lower in the IT/PCA group compared with the PCA group at 12 hours and 24 hours (P = 0.0001). Return to solid food ingestion was quickest in the EPI group (2.0 days) followed by the IT/PCA (2.6 days) and PCA alone (3.2 days) (P < 0.002). Respiratory depression and transient neurologic change occurred most frequently in the EPI group (EPI 11/55 pts vs. 1/42 IT/PCA vs. 0/41 PCA P < 0.001). Pruritis was greatest in the epidural group (11/55 P < 0.05). There were no intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential changes or permanent neurologic injury recorded in any group. CONCLUSION: An EPI controls postoperative pain for the longest period of time and allows for a quicker return to consumption of solid foods. However, a single preoperative intrathecal morphine injection controls the pain equally for the first 24 hours with less pruritis and with less adverse events thus requiring less nursing and physician intervention after PSF and SSI in AIS. All methods were safe with no neurologic injury recorded.
机译:研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:比较单独使用吗啡的患者自控镇痛(PCA),术前鞘内注射吗啡和PCA(IT / PCA)以及不采用PCA(EPI)的硬膜外导管输注在控制脊柱后路融合术后疼痛的疗效( (PSF)和节段性脊柱器械(SSI)在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)中的应用。背景数据摘要:AIS中PSF和SSI后的术后疼痛控制可以通过不同方式进行管理。 EPI可延长疼痛缓解时间,但取决于硬膜外腔中导管的正确放置和维护。术前单次鞘内注射吗啡也可提供长效镇痛作用。尚无这三种术后疼痛控制方法的直接比较报道。方法:1997年至2005年,在2个机构中进行了IRB批准的回顾性图表审查。对病历进行了审查,以确定多个时间段手术后的疼痛评分。使用Student t检验和χ2检验比较这三组,显着性定义为P <0.05。结果:IT / PCA(N = 42),PCA(N = 41)或EPI(N = 55)组的性别,年龄,曲线大小或融合水平的数量无统计学差异。 IT / PCA组术后8小时的疼痛评分最低(P <0.05),EPI组的疼痛评分则在24小时内较低(P <0.05)。在12小时和24小时时,IT / PCA组的总吗啡使用量(mg / kg)低于PCA组(P = 0.0001)。 EPI组(2.0天)恢复固体食物摄入最快,其次是IT / PCA(2.6天)和单独PCA(3.2天)(P <0.002)。呼吸抑制和短暂性神经系统改变在EPI组中最常见(EPI 11/55分vs. 1/42 IT / PCA vs. 0/41 PCA P <0.001)。硬膜外组的瘙痒最大(11/55 P <0.05)。任何组均未记录术中体感诱发电位改变或永久性神经损伤。结论:EPI可在最长的时间内控制术后疼痛,并可以更快地恢复食用固体食物。但是,术前单次鞘内注射吗啡可在头24小时内平均控制疼痛,减少瘙痒症和不良事件的发生,因此在AIS中进行PSF和SSI后需要较少的护理和医师干预。所有方法都是安全的,没有神经损伤的记录。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号