首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism >Improvement in Wrist Pain with Ultrasound-guided Glucocorticoid Injections: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data
【24h】

Improvement in Wrist Pain with Ultrasound-guided Glucocorticoid Injections: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data

机译:超声引导下糖皮质激素注射改善手腕疼痛:单个患者数据的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This meta-analysis compares change in wrist pain following ultrasound-guided (US-guided) intra-articular glucocorticoid injections with change in pain after palpation-guided injections in persons with inflammatory arthritis or osteoarthritis. Methods: Data sources included MEDLINE, Cochrane, BIOSIS, CINAHL, ACR/AHRP abstracts, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies that assessed change in wrist pain with direct comparison of US-guided and palpation-guided injections were included in the meta-analysis. Subject-level data was sought from authors of all relevant studies. Primary outcome was mean change in wrist pain from baseline to 1-6 week follow-up by visual analog scale (VAS). Mean difference in VAS was calculated for comparative studies. Secondary outcome was proportion attaining Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII), defined as VAS reduction > 20%. Odds ratios (ORs) of MCII were calculated for comparative studies. Mean differences in VAS and ORs for MCII for comparative studies were combined using fixed and random effects meta-analysis. Results: Ten studies were eligible, and adequate data was available from 4 studies with direct comparison of US-guided and palpation-guided treatment arms. The difference in mean VAS reduction (US-guided minus palpation-guided) ranged from -0.2 to 1.3, with a combined estimate of 1.0 (95% CI 0.3, 1.7). OR for MCII in comparative studies ranged from 1.0 to 12.4, with a combined OR of 3.2 (95% CI 1.2, 8.5) in favor of ultrasound. Conclusions: US-guided glucocorticoid injections to the wrist result in greater reductions in pain, and greater likelihood of attaining MCII than palpation-guided injections at 1-6 weeks follow-up.
机译:目的:这项荟萃分析比较了超声引导(US引导)关节内糖皮质激素注射后手腕疼痛的变化与炎性关节炎或骨关节炎患者触诊引导注射后疼痛的变化。方法:数据来源包括MEDLINE,Cochrane,BIOSIS,CINAHL,ACR / AHRP摘要和ClinicalTrials.gov。荟萃分析包括通过直接比较US引导和触诊引导注射评估腕痛变化的研究。从所有相关研究的作者那里寻求学科水平的数据。主要结果是通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)从基线到随访1-6周的平均腕痛变化。计算VAS的平均差异以进行比较研究。次要结果是达到最小临床重要改善(MCII)的比例,定义为VAS减少> 20%。计算MCII的几率(OR)以进行比较研究。使用固定和随机效应荟萃分析,将MCII的VAS和OR的平均差异进行比较研究。结果:十项研究是合格的,并且有四项研究获得了足够的数据,这些研究直接比较了美国指导的和触诊指导的治疗组。平均VAS减少的差异(美国指导的减触诊指导)范围为-0.2至1.3,综合估计值为1.0(95%CI 0.3,1.7)。在比较研究中,MCII的OR为1.0至12.4,合并OR为3.2(95%CI 1.2,8.5),有利于超声检查。结论:在随访的1-6周,与触诊引导的注射相比,对腕部进行US引导的糖皮质激素注射可更大程度地减轻疼痛,并更有可能获得MCII。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号