...
首页> 外文期刊>Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA >Hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: Cost-utility analysis performed alongside a randomized, controlled trial
【24h】

Hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: Cost-utility analysis performed alongside a randomized, controlled trial

机译:髋关节置换术与经皮空心插管螺钉内固定治疗老年人股骨颈移位骨折:成本-效用分析与一项随机对照试验一起进行

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary We estimated the cost-effectiveness of hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation for elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Over 2 years, patients treated with hemiarthroplasty gained more qualityadjusted life years than patients treated with internal fixation. In addition, costs for hemiarthroplasty were lower. Hemiarthroplasty was thus cost effective. Introduction Estimating the cost utility of hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Methods A cost-utility analysis (CUA) was conducted alongside a clinical randomized controlled trial at a university hospital in Norway; 166 patients, 124 (75%) women with a mean age of 82 years were randomized to either internal fixation (n=86) or hemiarthroplasty (n=80). Patients were followed up at 4, 12, and 24 months. Healthrelated quality of life was assessed with the EQ-5D, and in combination with time used to calculate patients' qualityadjusted life years (QALYs). Resource use was identified, quantified, and valued for direct and indirect hospital costs and for societal costs. Results were expressed in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results Over the 2-year period, patients treated with hemiarthroplasty gained 0.15-0.20 more QALYs than patients treated with internal fixation. For the hemiarthroplasty group, the direct hospital costs, total hospital costs, and total costs were non-significantly less costly compared with the internal fixation group, with an incremental cost of ?2,731 (p=0.81), ?2,474 (p=0.80), and ?14,160 (p=0.07), respectively. Thus, hemiarthroplasty was the dominant treatment. Sensitivity analyses by bootstrapping supported these findings. Conclusion Hemiarthroplasty was a cost-effective treatment. Trial registration, NCT00464230.
机译:小结我们估计与置换术相比,老年置换股骨颈骨折患者进行半髋置换术的成本效益。在超过2年的时间里,接受半髋关节置换术的患者比接受内固定术的患者获得更长的质量调整生命年。此外,半髋关节置换术的成本较低。因此,髋关节置换术具有成本效益。简介估计与内固定相比,半髋置换术在治疗老年人股骨颈移位骨折中的成本效用。方法在挪威的一家大学医院进行了一项成本-效用分析(CUA)并进行了一项临床随机对照试验。 166名患者,124名(75%)平均年龄为82岁的女性被随机分为内固定术(n = 86)或半髋关节置换术(n = 80)。在第4、12和24个月对患者进行随访。与健康相关的生活质量使用EQ-5D进行了评估,并与用于计算患者的质量调整生命年(QALYs)的时间相结合。对资源使用进行了识别,量化和评估,以用于直接和间接的医院费用以及社会费用。结果以增加的成本效益比表示。结果在2年的时间里,半髋关节置换术患者的QALYs比内固定术患者多了0.15-0.20。对于半人工关节置换组,直接住院费用,总住院费用和总费用与内固定组相比没有显着降低,分别为2,731欧元(p = 0.81),2,474欧元(p = 0.80)。 ,和分别为?14,160(p = 0.07)。因此,半髋关节置换术是主要的治疗方法。通过自举进行敏感性分析支持了这些发现。结论髋关节置换术是一种经济有效的治疗方法。试用注册,NCT00464230。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号