...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm In Women With a Pelvic Mass
【24h】

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm In Women With a Pelvic Mass

机译:女性盆腔包块卵巢恶性肿瘤风险诊断的准确性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: It is often difficult to distinguish a benign pelvic mass from a malignancy and tools to help referring physician are needed. The purpose of this study was to validate the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm in women presenting with a pelvic mass.METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, blinded clinical trial that included women who presented to a gynecologist, a family practitioner, an internist, or a general surgeon with an adnexal mass. Serum HE4 and CA 125 were determined preoperatively. A Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm score was calculated and classified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups for having a malignancy. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm were estimated.RESULTS: A total of 472 patients were evaluated with 383 women diagnosed with benign disease and 89 women with a malignancy. The incidence of all cancers was 15% and 10% for ovarian cancer. In the postmenopausal group, a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 76.0% and for the premenopausal group the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 74.2% for detecting ovarian cancer. When considering all women together, the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm had a sensitivity of 93.8%, a specificity of 74.9%, and a negative predictive value of 99.0%.CONCLUSION: The use of the serum biomarkers HE4 and CA 125 with the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm has a high sensitivity for the prediction of ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass. These findings support the use of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm as a tool for the triage of women with an adnexal mass to gynecologic oncologists.
机译:目的:通常很难区分良性盆腔肿块与恶性肿瘤,因此需要工具来帮助转诊医师。这项研究的目的是验证有盆腔肿块的女性患卵巢恶性肿瘤的风险。方法:这是一项前瞻性,多中心,盲法的临床试验,其中包括向妇科医生,家庭医生,内科医生,或有附件包块的普通外科医师。术前确定血清HE4和CA 125。计算卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法得分,并将患有恶性肿瘤的患者分为高风险和低风险组。结果:评估了472例患者中的383例诊断为良性疾病的女性和89例恶性肿瘤的女性,评估了卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法的敏感性,特异性,阴性预测值和阳性预测值。卵巢癌的所有癌症的发生率分别为15%和10%。绝经后组的敏感性为92.3%,特异性为76.0%,绝经前组的卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法检测卵巢癌的敏感性为100%,特异性为74.2%。综合考虑所有妇女,卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法的敏感性为93.8%,特异性为74.9%,阴性预测值为99.0%。结论:使用血清生物标志物HE4和CA 125可降低卵巢癌风险。卵巢恶性算法对骨盆占位妇女卵巢癌的预测具有很高的敏感性。这些发现支持使用卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法作为对妇科肿瘤科医生进行附件包块妇女分流的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号