首页> 外文期刊>Rural Sociology >Rural policy and direct local participation: democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency, and locality-based policy.
【24h】

Rural policy and direct local participation: democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency, and locality-based policy.

机译:农村政策和地方直接参与:民主,包容,集体代理和基于地方的政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During the closing decades of the 20th century, the federal government has experienced a period of delegitimation and fiscal crisis that has led to decentralization of some federal programmes and a fledgling revival of community- and place-based policies. These and other locality-based policies are not new tools. The renewed interest in this type of policy raises questions about their effectiveness. Historic and recent records of locality-based policies suggest that they are not panaceas for achieving programmatic goals. Three cases provide an empirical, comparative basis for assessing the liabilities of locality-based policies: the Third New Deal efforts to institute county land use planning; Mexico's experiences with community forestry; and emerging grassroots ecosystem management movements in western USA. Among other factors, the degree of local democracy and inclusiveness and the quality of local social, economic, and physical infrastructures are identified as important in mediating effectivepolicy implementation.
机译:在20世纪末的几十年中,联邦政府经历了一个合法化和财政危机的时期,这导致了一些联邦计划的权力下放,以及刚起步的社区和地方政策的复兴。这些和其他基于本地的策略不是新工具。人们对这种政策重新产生了兴趣,引起了人们对其效力的质疑。基于位置的政策的历史记录和最新记录表明,它们并不是实现计划目标的灵丹妙药。以下三个案例为评估基于地方的政策的负债提供了经验的比较基础:第三是制定县土地使用规划的新政;墨西哥在社区林业方面的经验;以及美国西部新兴的基层生态系统管理运动。除其他因素外,地方民主的程度和包容性以及地方社会,经济和物质基础设施的质量被认为对调解有效的政策执行至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号