首页> 外文学位 >Governance in non-democracies: The role of civil society in increasing pluralism and accountability in local public policy.
【24h】

Governance in non-democracies: The role of civil society in increasing pluralism and accountability in local public policy.

机译:非民主国家的治理:民间社会在增加地方公共政策的多元化和问责制中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How can non-democracies achieve good governance without formal channels of interest articulation and electoral mechanisms of accountability? Using a mixed methods research design, I find that civil society informally plays this role of articulating societal interests and creating a measure of accountability through the transmission of information about local government decisions. While civil society activity produces similar governance outcomes in both democracies and non-democracies, the process or mechanisms by which they do so differ between regime types. Through extensive fieldwork in China supported by a dissertation improvement grant from the National Science Foundation, I find that civil society---comprised of voluntary organizations such as NGOs, clubs, and business associations---use informal and personal channels to access a closed policy-making process. The findings in my dissertation suggest a counterintuitive explanation for this puzzle---that the institutional conditions of non-democracies, namely the lack of transparent information and access to the policy process, increase the importance of civil society groups in local policy making. Simply put, my research finds that in non-democracies such as China, groups leverage their ability to transmit credible information from society to local government about societal needs thus increasing pluralism in the local policy process, and from local government to citizens and institutions of horizontal accountability about government behavior. This role of increasing pluralism in the policy-making process and accountability among local officials is similar to the outcomes documented by Robert Putnam and others in democracies, which draws into question the focus in the effective governance literature on exclusively formal institutions. Therefore, this research is vital for understanding the mechanisms by which civil society groups encourage good governance across all regimes not just liberal democracies, and the process of developing local policy in an authoritarian state such as China.
机译:没有正式的利益表达渠道和问责制选举机制,非民主国家如何实现善政?使用混合方法研究设计,我发现民间社会非正式地发挥了表达社会利益和通过传递有关地方政府决策信息的责任制的作用。公民社会的活动在民主国家和非民主国家都产生类似的治理结果,但在政体类型之间,其进行的过程或机制却有所不同。通过在国家科学基金会的论文改进资助下在中国进行的广泛野外工作,我发现民间社会-由非政府组织,俱乐部和商业协会等自愿组织组成-使用非正式和个人渠道来访问封闭的决策过程。我的论文中的发现提出了这个难题的反直觉解释,即非民主国家的制度条件,即缺乏透明的信息和进入政策程序的渠道,增加了民间社会团体在地方决策中的重要性。简而言之,我的研究发现,在中国这样的非民主国家,群体利用自身的能力将社会需求的可信信息从社会传递给地方政府,从而增加了地方政策流程中的多元化,并从地方政府到公民和横向机构有关政府行为的责任。日益多元化在决策过程中的作用以及地方官员之间的问责制与罗伯特·普特南(Robert Putnam)等人在民主国家中所证明的结果相似,这使有效治理文献只关注正式机构的焦点受到质疑。因此,这项研究对于理解民间社会团体鼓励在所有政权中不仅在自由民主国家中促进善政的机制,以及在诸如中国这样的专制国家发展地方政策的过程至关重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Teets, Jessica C.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Boulder.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Boulder.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 186 p.
  • 总页数 186
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号