首页> 外文期刊>Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries >Fishing rights or fishing wrongs?
【24h】

Fishing rights or fishing wrongs?

机译:捕鱼权或捕鱼失误?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increasing attention is being paid to overfishing and the biological, economic, and social implications of persistent mismanagement of aquatic resources. However, little attention is focused on sustainable fisheries, and the lessons to be learned from management systems that produce these successes. Although there is no single prescription for sustainability, a range of quota-based management tools have been used to eliminate the competition for fish, increasing the incentives for long-term investment and efficiency. Variously referred to as fishing rights, tenure rights, or dedicated access privileges, quota-based fisheries confer a percentage (or quota) of the total allowable catch to named entities over some predetermined period, from short-term auction systems to intergenerational customary sea tenure. Whether a rights-based system stems from a traditional fishing rights system or has been recently introduced into modern commercial fisheries, achieving sustainability in the fishery is dependent on providing incentives to the collective (from local communities to national fleets) to actively participate in self-regulation of the resource. Thus, criticism of the approach often stems from the observed potential for cheating at the individual level (e.g., high grading and excessive discards), and the necessary exclusivity that accompanies any transition in management from open access to club membership. It is also worth noting that the resource in question (the fish) remains a public good, and as such, the public should be compensated (or at least not taxed) for their use. Thus, the cost of fishery management, and the windfall profits of fishery conversion, should be shared. It is argued that rights-based management is not a silver bullet, and is probably not appropriate for all fisheries; however, the successes of the longline fisheries for Pacific halibut and sablefish in Alaska, the artisanal fisheries for loco in Chile and for spiny lobster in Mexico, and the Australian fisheries for Northern prawns and rock lobster, all clearly indicate that fishing rights should have a central place in the fisheries management toolbox..
机译:人们越来越重视过度捕捞以及持续管理水生资源对生物,经济和社会的影响。但是,很少将注意力集中在可持续渔业上,而要从取得这些成功的管理系统中汲取的教训也很少。尽管没有单一的可持续性规定,但是已经使用了一系列基于配额的管理工具来消除对鱼类的竞争,从而增加了对长期投资和效率的激励。基于配额的渔业被称为捕捞权,权属权利或专用的获取特权,在一定时期内,从短期拍卖系统到代际习惯性海权制,将总允许捕捞量的百分比(或配额)授予指定实体。无论是基于权利的制度是源自传统的捕鱼权制度,还是最近已被引入现代商业渔业中,实现渔业的可持续性都取决于向集体(从当地社区到国家船队)提供激励以积极参与自我捕捞。资源的调节。因此,对该方法的批评通常源于观察到的在个人层面上作弊的潜力(例如,高等级和过多丢弃),以及管理上从开放获取到俱乐部会员制的任何过渡所必需的排他性。还值得注意的是,所涉及的资源(鱼)仍然是公共物品,因此,应就其使用向公众补偿(或至少不征税)。因此,应当分担渔业管理成本和渔业转产的暴利。有人认为,基于权利的管理不是万灵药,而且可能不适用于所有渔业。但是,阿拉斯加太平洋大比目鱼和黑貂延绳钓渔业的成功,智利疯子和墨西哥龙虾的手工渔业的成功以及北虾和龙虾的澳大利亚渔业的成功都清楚地表明,捕捞权应具有渔业管理工具箱的中心位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号