首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Dosing regimen and the frequency of macular hemorrhages in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab.
【24h】

Dosing regimen and the frequency of macular hemorrhages in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab.

机译:雷珠单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的剂量方案和黄斑出血频率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate if monthly intravitreal ranibizumab decreases risk of macular hemorrhages in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Incidences of macular hemorrhages in the control and ranibizumab groups from three, multicenter, randomized, clinical trials (MARINA, ANCHOR, and PIER) were compared. Two time intervals (Months 0-3 and 5-17) were evaluated to account for transition from monthly to quarterly injections in PIER. Time interval after Month 17 was excluded because of crossover from control to active treatment in all trials. RESULTS: Months 0-3: All trials showed higher incidence rates of hemorrhages in control compared with ranibizumab groups (ANCHOR: photodynamic therapy [27.3%], 0.3 mg [8.0%], 0.5 mg [8.6%]; MARINA: sham [18.6%], 0.3 mg [8.8%], 0.5 mg [8.8%]; and PIER: sham [16.1%], 0.3 mg [3.4%], 0.5 mg [3.3%]). In ANCHOR and MARINA, data of Months 5-17 showed higher incidence rates in control compared with monthly ranibizumab groups (ANCHOR: photodynamic therapy [47.8%], 0.3 mg [12.5%], 0.5 mg [12.3%]; and MARINA: sham [38.0%], 0.3 mg [13.2%], 0.5 mg [13.0%]), but this was not seen for quarterly ranibizumab groups in PIER (sham [22.4%], 0.3 mg [23.7%], 0.5 mg [28.3%]). CONCLUSION: Treatment with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab was associated with reduced risk of new macular hemorrhages when compared with photodynamic therapy (ANCHOR) or sham (MARINA and PIER). There was no difference between PIER quarterly ranibizumab-treated and sham patients.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是调查玻璃体腔内雷珠单抗每月是否可降低继发于年龄相关性黄斑变性的脉络膜新生血管患者黄斑出血的风险。方法:比较了三个,多中心,随机,临床试验(MARINA,ANCHOR和PIER)的对照组和兰尼单抗组的黄斑出血发生率。评估了两个时间间隔(第0-3和5-17个月),以解释PIER中从每月注射到每季度注射的转变。由于所有试验均从对照过渡到积极治疗,因此排除了第17个月后的时间间隔。结果:0-3个月:所有试验均显示,与兰尼单抗组相比,对照组的出血发生率更高(ANCHOR:光动力疗法[27.3%],0.3 mg [8.0%],0.5 mg [8.6%]; MARINA:假手术[18.6] %],0.3 mg [8.8%],0.5 mg [8.8%];和PIER:假[16.1%],0.3 mg [3.4%],0.5 mg [3.3%])。在ANCHOR和MARINA中,第5-17个月的数据显示,与每月兰尼单抗组相比,对照组的发病率更高(ANCHOR:光动力疗法[47.8%],0.3 mg [12.5%],0.5 mg [12.3%]; MARINA:假手术) [38.0%],0.3 mg [13.2%],0.5 mg [13.0%]),但在PIER的季度雷珠单抗组中未观察到(假[22.4%],0.3 mg [23.7%],0.5 mg [28.3%] ])。结论:与光动力疗法(ANCHOR)或假手术(MARINA和PIER)相比,每月玻璃体腔内雷珠单抗治疗与新发黄斑出血的风险降低相关。 PIER季度兰尼单抗治疗组和假患者之间无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号