...
首页> 外文期刊>Resource and energy economics >Anchors, endorsements, and preferences: A field experiment
【24h】

Anchors, endorsements, and preferences: A field experiment

机译:定位符,认可和偏好:现场实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates how access to political endorsements affects stated preferences for an environmental public good in Switzerland. We developed a contingent valuation survey questionnaire with two valuation questions, the first formulated as a (hypothetical) policy referendum, the second an open-ended WTP question. For the referendum question we solicited endorsements from a range of political parties and relevant interest groups. We then conducted a split-sample mail-survey experiment in which a table listing the endorsements was included with a subsample of the questionnaires. Access to the policy endorsements significantly affected the responses to the open-ended willingness-to-pay question. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究调查了获得政治认可的方式如何影响瑞士对环保公共物品的既定偏好。我们开发了一个有条件的估值调查问卷,其中包含两个估值问题,第一个问题被表述为(假设的)政策公投,第二个问题是不限人数的WTP问题。对于全民投票问题,我们征求了各政党和相关利益集团的支持。然后,我们进行了拆分样本邮件调查实验,在该实验中,列出了认可的表格与问卷的子样本一起包含在内。获得政策认可的机会极大地影响了对开放式支付意愿问题的回答。 (c)2007 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号