首页> 外文期刊>Library hi tech >Evaluation of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries using DEA techniques and a proposal of alternative evaluation variables
【24h】

Evaluation of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries using DEA techniques and a proposal of alternative evaluation variables

机译:利用DEA技术评估高校图书馆资源利用效率及备选评价变量的建议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper seeks to rediscover the most suitable efficiency evaluation variables (input and output variables) for digital libraries and to employ the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to measure the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries. Design/methodology/approach: In order to analyze and evaluate university library efficiency, the paper introduces the DEA-CCR Model and the DEA-BCC Model. Based on these research tools, the Technical Efficiency (CCR*BCC) was determined. First, a reference group was created with a 100 percent efficiency rate, then the factors contributing to inefficient DMUs were analyzed, and the difference in the efficiency rate compared according to the different governing bodies of the libraries. Finally, the difference of efficiency according to the introduction and rejection of electronic resources was analyzed. It was possible to measure the technical efficiency, pure-technical efficiency, and scale efficiency. Findings: The results showed that the efficiency of university libraries varied significantly according to whether or not electronic resources were included in the evaluation. In addition, the findings confirmed decision making units (DMUs) have a 100 percent efficiency rate and a low efficiency rate as well as proposed benchmarking DMUs for inefficient DMUs and a direction for future improvements. Originality/value: The paper identifies that there was a significant difference in efficiency, according to the presence of electronic resources in university libraries.
机译:本文旨在重新发现最适合数字图书馆的效率评估变量(输入和输出变量),并采用数据包络分析(DEA)模型来衡量大学图书馆的资源利用效率。设计/方法/方法:为了分析和评估大学图书馆的效率,本文介绍了DEA-CCR模型和DEA-BCC模型。基于这些研究工具,确定了技术效率(CCR * BCC)。首先,创建效率为100%的参考小组,然后分析造成DMU效率低下的因素,并根据图书馆的不同管理机构比较效率的差异。最后,分析了根据电子资源的引入和排斥所引起的效率差异。可以测量技术效率,纯技术效率和规模效率。结果:结果表明,根据评估中是否包括电子资源,大学图书馆的效率差异很大。此外,调查结果证实了决策单位(DMU)的效率为100%,效率为低,并且针对效率低下的DMU提出了基准DMU,并提出了未来改进的方向。原创性/价值:根据大学图书馆中电子资源的存在,本文发现效率存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号