...
首页> 外文期刊>Cell biology international. >Comparison of different methods for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord matrix: Proliferation and multilineage differentiation as compared to mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood and bone marrow
【24h】

Comparison of different methods for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord matrix: Proliferation and multilineage differentiation as compared to mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood and bone marrow

机译:从脐带基质分离间充质干细胞的不同方法的比较:与从脐带血和骨髓分离的间充质干细胞相比,增殖和多系分化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have identified the most appropriate method of isolating human umbilical cord matrix-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCM-MSCs) and compared morphological, phenotypic, proliferative and differentiation characteristics of UCM-MSCs with bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) and umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (UCB-MSCs). Three explant culture methods and three enzymatic methods were compared with regards to time for primary culture, cell number, cell morphology, immune phenotype and differentiation potential. Morphological, phenotypic, proliferative and differentiation characteristics of UCM-MSCs, BM-MSCs and UCB-MSCs were also compared. UCM-MSCs isolated using the 10 mm size tissue explant method led to shorter primary culture time, higher numbers of isolated cells and higher proliferation rates compared with other isolation methods. Immune phenotype and multilineage differentiation capacity did not differ significantly among six groups. UCM-MSCs had similar characteristics as BM-MSCs and UCB-MSCs, including fibroblastic morphology, typical immunophenotypic markers and multilineage differentiation capacity. In comparison with UCB-MSCs and BM-MSCs, UCM-MSCs have higher proliferative capacity, higher rate of chondrogenic differentiation, and higher expression of CD 146. The results suggest that the 10 mm size tissue culture method is the optimal protocol for the isolation of UCM-MSCs. Given the distinct advantages of UC, such as accessibility, painless acquisition and abundance of cells obtained, we propose that UC be considered an alternative to BM and UCB as a source of MSCs for cell therapy.
机译:我们已经确定了最合适的分离人脐带基质来源的间充质干细胞(UCM-MSCs)的方法,并将UCM-MSCs的形态,表型,增殖和分化特征与骨髓来源的MSCs(BM-MSCs)和脐带血进行了比较。脐血来源的MSC(UCB-MSC)。比较了三种外植体培养方法和三种酶促方法的基本培养时间,细胞数量,细胞形态,免疫表型和分化潜能。还比较了UCM-MSC,BM-MSC和UCB-MSC的形态,表型,增殖和分化特征。与其他分离方法相比,使用10 mm大小的组织外植体方法分离的UCM-MSC缩短了原代培养时间,分离的细胞数量更多,增殖速率更高。免疫表型和多系分化能力在六组之间没有显着差异。 UCM-MSC具有与BM-MSC和UCB-MSC相似的特征,包括成纤维细胞形态,典型的免疫表型标记和多系分化能力。与UCB-MSC和BM-MSC相比,UCM-MSC具有更高的增殖能力,更高的软骨分化速率和更高的CD 146表达。结果表明,10 mm大小的组织培养方法是分离的最佳方案UCM-MSC。考虑到UC的独特优势,例如可访问性,无痛获取和获得的细胞丰富,我们建议将UC视为BM和UCB的替代品,作为细胞疗法的MSC来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号