【24h】

The come-back of hypofractionation?

机译:超分割的卷土重来?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hypofractionation (i.e. the use of fewer higher fractional doses than usual) is not a new concept. It had actually been proposed in the early year of Radiotherapy by the German and Austrian specialists. In the seventy's, supported by the - wrong - hypotheses which gave birth to the NSD (Nominal Standard Dose), hypofractionation reappears. The consequential increase of late complications which was observed led the radiation oncologists to give up again using large doses per fraction, except for a few specific situations, such as palliative treatments. We are recently facing a new "come-back" of hypofractionation, in particular for breast and prostate cancers. In the case of breast cancer, the aim is clearly to look for more "convenience" for both the patients and the physicians, proposing shorter irradiation schedules including a lesser number of fractions. Some "modestly" hypofractionated schemes have been proposed and used, without apparently altering the efficacy/toxicity ratio, but these results have been seriously questioned. As for prostate cancer, the situation is different, since in that case new radiobiological data are at the origin of the newly proposed hypofractionation schedules. A number of papers actually strongly suggested that the fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer could be higher than the one of the tissues responsible for late toxicity (i.e the exact opposite of the classical dogma). Based on those data, several hypofractionated schemes have been proposed, with a few preliminary results looking similar to the ones obtained by the classical schedules. However, no randomised study is available so far, and a few recent radiobiological data are now questioning the new dogma of the high fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer. For those two - frequent - cancers, it seems therefore that prudence should prevail before altering classical irradiation schedules which have proven their efficacy, while staying open to new concepts and proposing well-designed randomised trials in specific cases.
机译:超分割(即使用比平常少的更高的分次剂量)不是一个新概念。实际上,这是德国和奥地利专家在放疗的早期提出的。在七十年代,由于诞生了NSD(名义标准剂量)的错误假设的支持,超分割现象再次出现。观察到的后期并发症的相应增加导致放射肿瘤学家除某些特殊情况(例如姑息治疗)外,每小部分再次使用大剂量药物。我们最近面临着新的超分割现象的“回归”,特别是对于乳腺癌和前列腺癌。在乳腺癌的情况下,目标显然是为患者和医生寻求更多的“便利”,提出了较短的放疗时间表,包括更少的分数。已经提出并使用了一些“适度”的分解方案,而没有明显改变功效/毒性比,但是这些结果受到了严重的质疑。至于前列腺癌,情况有所不同,因为在这种情况下,新的放射生物学数据是新提出的超分割方案的起源。实际上,许多论文强烈建议前列腺癌的分级敏感性可能高于引起晚期毒性的组织之一(即与经典教条正好相反)。根据这些数据,提出了几种分解方案,一些初步结果看起来与经典时间表所获得的结果相似。但是,到目前为止,尚无随机研究,并且最近的一些放射生物学数据正在质疑前列腺癌高分割敏感性的新教条。因此,对于这两种频繁发生的癌症,在改变经典的放疗时间表(已证明其疗效)之前,应谨慎行事,同时对新概念持开放态度,并在特定情况下提出设计良好的随机试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号