首页> 外文期刊>Methods in Ecology and Evolution >Maxent is not a presence-absence method: a comment on Thibaud et al.
【24h】

Maxent is not a presence-absence method: a comment on Thibaud et al.

机译:Maxent不是一种不在场的方法:对Thibaud等人的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1.Thibaud etal. (Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2014) present a framework for simulating species and evaluating the relative effects of factors affecting the predictions from species distribution models (SDMs). They demonstrate their approach by generating presence-absence data sets for different simulated species and analysing them using four modelling methods: three presence-absence methods and Maxent, which is a presence-background modelling tool. One of their results is striking: that their use of Maxent performs well in estimating occupancy probabilities and even outperforms the other methods on small sample sizes. This result is of concern to us, because it suggests that Maxent directly offers a useful alternative for modelling presence-absence data, which may prompt widespread adoption of this use of Maxent. In this paper, we explore why this would be a mistake. We draw on the theory underlying how the Maxent model operates and on simulations to discover: (i) why Maxent appears to fare as well as it does in their evaluation and (ii) why the best-suited presence-absence method for data analysis (the generating model; a GLM) does not perform as well as we would expect. We demonstrate that (i) the good performance observed for Maxent is largely a coincidence; the simulated species match well the arbitrary default parameter that Maxent applies to map its relative output into a 0-1 scale, but errors are much larger for other species we simulate; (ii) the performance of the GLM is poorer than expected because Thibaud etal. do not use model selection and fit a model that is too complex for the amount of data available. Maxent is a presence-background method and only provides estimates of relative suitability regardless of how the background sample is specified. When presence-absence data are available, one can transform Maxent's relative estimates into estimates of occupancy probability, and we provide methods to do so. However, this requires the user to post-process Maxent's output. Proper PA methods such as GLMs can perform well under small sample sizes, provided care is taken during modelling to avoid overfitting. We demonstrate an effective method using regularisation with the R package glmnet.
机译:1,蒂博尔等人(Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2014)提供了一个框架,用于模拟物种并评估影响物种分布模型(SDMs)预测的因素的相对影响。他们通过为不同的模拟物种生成不存在数据集并使用四种建模方法对其进行分析来演示其方法:三种存在方法和Maxent(一种存在背景建模工具)。他们的结果之一是惊人的:他们对Maxent的使用在估计入住率方面表现良好,甚至在小样本量方面也优于其他方法。这个结果令我们感到担忧,因为它表明Maxent直接为建模存在数据提供了一种有用的替代方法,这可能会促使人们广泛采用Maxent的这种用法。在本文中,我们探讨了为什么这将是一个错误。我们借鉴了Maxent模型如何运作的基础理论以及通过模拟得出的发现:(i)Maxent为什么在评估过程中表现得和它一样好;(ii)为什么最适合数据分析的存在/不存在方法(生成模型; GLM)的效果不如我们预期。我们证明(i)Maxent的良好表现在很大程度上是巧合;模拟的物种与Maxent用来将其相对输出映射到0-1比例的任意默认参数匹配得很好,但是对于我们模拟的其他物种,误差要大得多; (ii)由于Thibaud等人的缘故,GLM的性能不及预期。不要使用模型选择,而要对可用数据量过大的模型进行拟合。 Maxent是一种存在背景方法,并且仅提供相对适用性的估计值,而不管如何指定背景样本。当存在缺勤数据可用时,可以将Maxent的相对估计值转换为占用概率的估计值,并且我们提供了这样做的方法。但是,这需要用户对Maxent的输出进行后处理。适当的PA方法(例如GLM)在小样本量下可以很好地发挥作用,但要在建模过程中注意避免过度拟合。我们演示了使用带有R包glmnet的正则化的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号