首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Towards greater clarity in the role of ambiguity in clinical reasoning.
【24h】

Towards greater clarity in the role of ambiguity in clinical reasoning.

机译:进一步明确歧义在临床推理中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Experts solve problems differently than do beginners. They rapidly identify patterns, prioritise available data and seek out the information that will most effi-ciendy allow them to reach a solution. They can identify common scenarios that can be resolved with few additional data, as opposed to those that require deliberate reasoning from first principles. In general, they have efficient problem-solving strategies that allow them to arrive rapidly at the most likely set of diagnoses. The one thing experts generally cannot do, however, is articulate the mental processes by which they accomplish all this. Thus, theoretical models are needed to explain how experts think. One model proposes that experts, through long experience, develop intuitive 'scripts' that operate autonomously, beneath the level of conscious awareness. Scripts consist of prepositional, probabilistic networks of relationships among large numbers of items. In approaching an ambiguous clinical situation, experts are thought to map the available information onto the most appropriate scripts.
机译:专家解决问题的方式与初学者不同。他们迅速确定模式,对可用数据进行优先排序,并找出最有效的信息以使他们能够找到解决方案。他们可以识别只需少量额外数据即可解决的常见方案,而不是那些需要从第一原理中进行仔细推理的方案。通常,他们具有有效的问题解决策略,可以使他们快速地进行最可能的诊断。但是,专家通常无法做的一件事就是阐明他们完成所有这些任务的心理过程。因此,需要理论模型来解释专家的想法。一种模型提出,专家们将通过长期的经验,在有意识的意识水平下,开发出能够自主运作的直观“脚本”。脚本由介词,大量项目之间的关系的概率网络组成。在处理模棱两可的临床情况时,认为专家会将可用信息映射到最合适的脚本上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号