首页> 外文期刊>Management science: Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences >Evoking Information in Probability Assessment: Knowledge Maps and Reasoning-Based Directed Questions
【24h】

Evoking Information in Probability Assessment: Knowledge Maps and Reasoning-Based Directed Questions

机译:在概率评估中唤起信息:知识图谱和基于推理的定向问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To assess probabilities in decision analysis, and for decision making in general, decision makers must evoke and apply relevant information. Decision analysts have developed a variety of structuring tools to aid decision makers in these tasks, including influence diagrams and knowledge maps. However, despite their pervasive use in practice, there have been no reported empirical tests of these tools. One goal of the present research was to provide an empirical test of the evocative knowledge map methodology. Second, a theoretical analysis of probability assessment was used to develop a new prescriptive elicitation technique. This tech-nique uses a theoretically-grounded set of directed questions to help decision makers evoke information for probability assessment. Experimental results showed that both the knowledge map and the new directed questions methodology elicited a higher quantity and quality of information from decision makers engaged in probability assessment tasks than did a control condition. Further, the information elicited by the two techniques was qualitatively different, suggesting that the two methods might profitably be used as complementary elicitation tech-niques.
机译:为了评估决策分析中的概率以及一般而言,决策者必须唤起并应用相关信息。决策分析师开发了各种结构化工具来帮助决策者完成这些任务,包括影响图和知识图。但是,尽管它们在实践中得到了广泛使用,但是还没有关于这些工具的经验测试报告。本研究的一个目标是提供令人回味的知识图谱方法的实证检验。其次,对概率评估进行了理论分析,以开发一种新的规范性启发技术。该技术使用一组理论上有针对性的定向问题来帮助决策者唤起信息以进行概率评估。实验结果表明,与控制条件相比,知识图谱和新的定向问题方法都可以从参与概率评估任务的决策者那里获得更高数量和质量的信息。此外,这两种技术所引发的信息在质量上是不同的,这表明这两种方法可以有益地用作互补的诱导技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号