首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Do alterations of endogenous angiotensin II levels regulate erythropoietin production in humans?
【24h】

Do alterations of endogenous angiotensin II levels regulate erythropoietin production in humans?

机译:内源性血管紧张素II水平的变化是否调节人类促红细胞生成素的产生?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS: Recent evidence suggests a potential role of angiotensin II in the physiological regulation of erythropoietin (Epo) production. While the administration of exogenous angiotensin II (AII) has been used so far to study its effects, the role of endogenous AII has remained unclear. METHODS: To alter endogenous AII in humans experimentally we used furosemide bolus injection as a short-term (study 1) and dietary salt as a long-term modulator (study 2). In an open crossover design, 12 healthy male volunteers received furosemide (F) 0.5 mg kg(-1) intravenously or placebo (P) in random order (study 1). With the same design, 12 volunteers received high-salt (HS), normal-salt (NS) and low-salt (LS) diet (study 2). Plasma renin activity (PRA) was analysed along with AII. Inulin and paraaminohippurate (PAH) clearances were used to indicate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF), respectively. RESULTS: While F stimulated AII and PRA and decreased GFR and RPF significantly, no concomitant alteration of Epo was observed [AUCEpo: placebo 5709 +/- 243 (% of baseline x h), furosemide: 5833 +/- 255 (% of baseline x h); 95% confidence interval (CI) -608.4, 856.0; P = 0.73]. F decreased GFR (from 103.6 +/- 4.0 to 90.6 +/- 4.8 ml min(-1) 1(-1) 73 m-2; 95% CI 1.1, 24.9; P < 0.05), but not RPF (study 1). Correspondingly, LS stimulated and HS decreased AII and PRA significantly. HS increased GFR and RPF. Again, Epo concentrations were not affected (AUCEpo: normal sodium 44 +/- 6.7 mIU x day ml(-1), low sodium 39 +/- 2.4 mIU x day ml(-1), high sodium 48.5 +/- 6.1 mIU x day ml(-1); normal salt/low salt 95% CI -11.9, 21.9, P = 0.54; normal salt/high salt 95% CI -14.4, 23.3, P = 0.63; study 2). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, at least in the physiological setting in healthy volunteers, increased concentrations of endogenous AII may not be a major factor of Epo regulation.
机译:目的:最近的证据表明血管紧张素II在促红细胞生成素(Epo)产生的生理调节中的潜在作用。迄今为止,虽然已使用外源性血管紧张素II(AII)的研究方法来研究其作用,但内源性AII的作用仍不清楚。方法:通过实验改变人类内源性AII,我们使用速尿快速推注(短期研究)(研究1)和饮食盐作为长期调节剂(研究2)。在开放式交叉设计中,12名健康的男性志愿者接受了静脉注射速尿(F)0.5 mg kg(-1)或以随机顺序接受了安慰剂(P)(研究1)。采用相同的设计,有12名志愿者接受了高盐(HS),正常盐(NS)和低盐(LS)饮食(研究2)。分析血浆肾素活性(PRA)和AII。菊粉和对氨基马尿酸酯(PAH)清除率分别用于指示肾小球滤过率(GFR)和肾血浆流量(RPF)。结果:尽管F刺激AII和PRA并显着降低GFR和RPF,但未观察到Epo的同时变化[AUCEpo:安慰剂5709 +/- 243(基线xh的百分比),速尿:5833 +/- 255(基线xh的百分比) ); 95%置信区间(CI)-608.4,856.0; P = 0.73]。 F降低GFR(从103.6 +/- 4.0降至90.6 +/- 4.8 ml min(-1)1(-1)73 m-2; 95%CI 1.1,24.9; P <0.05),但未降低RPF(研究1 )。相应地,LS刺激和HS显着降低AII和PRA。 HS增加了GFR和RPF。再次,Epo浓度不受影响(AUCEpo:正常钠44 +/- 6.7 mIU x天ml(-1),低钠39 +/- 2.4 mIU x天ml(-1),高钠48.5 +/- 6.1 mIU x天ml(-1);正常盐/低盐95%CI -11.9,21.9,P = 0.54;正常盐/高盐95%CI -14.4,23.3,P = 0.63;研究2)。结论:我们得出结论,至少在健康志愿者的生理环境中,内源性AII浓度升高可能不是Epo调节的主要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号